Are The United States Transportation Security Administration Measures Too Invasive? Research Proposal Samples

Introduction:

The United States Transportation Security Administration holds responsibility for implementing security measures, although designed to protect, can arguably be considered too invasive. This exploration seeks to set a cogent basis for analysis while adopting a preliminary perusal of various security measures, of recent import, under construction or discussion by the Federal powers for future application.

Questions to Consider:

In the following discussion we must decide upon a clear-cut focus pertaining to all stakeholders affected. In terms of breaching unreasonably invasive standards, with regard to the necessary security standards of information collection, privacy of citizens and powers of officials must clearly be investigated, questioned and established. Who has the final decision in any of the U.S. Transportation Security Measures outcomes? Does Homeland Security ultimately decide, the U.S. Supreme Court (should there arise any discrepancies), or Presidential Executive Powers hold first-string rights to any implementations of a prescient nature? When shall it be executed and how does the Budget play a role in any impact of such measures so adopted? Where shall the laws or renew policies be applied, in terms of overall federal lands and jurisdictions, and/or applications to States in a uniform manner?

Discussion:

Preliminary research has shown that the U.S. Department of Transportation has had its Fiscal Year 2015 Homeland Security Bill presented before the Appropriations Committee in May of 2014. The bill extends provisions for a nearly $40 billion discretionary funding. As common sense dictates, following the money trail is important and valued in assessment of gaining a precise understanding of how invasive such correlated collection procedures must be. The three areas of most concern at this stage involve rendering a comprehension of how invasive the following areas may be: (a) TSA Transportation Security Administration; such as frisking women and bodily invasion tactics of keeping records of nude-photos of innocent passengers, (b) Cybersecurity protocols; spying on citizen privacy electronic raises concerns, and (c) Coast Guard areas of the bill; will ordinary citizens be subjected to brutalized invasions while at sea?

Bills on Record for Renewal:

Canine Training Evaluation and as regards Public Collection of Information, is up for renewal which raises additional concerns. Given the factors of increasingly legal and legitimized medical cannabis protocols, what happens if a cancer patient is traveling and the canine, for example, sniffs out the aroma of marijuana? How invasive is the procedure, and shall such detainment be safely implemented if so deemed as necessary? The last information pertaining to this renewal policy and law had been given a 60 day Notice, to which further investigation must be rendered according to precisely and reasonably evaluate any possible consequences to the public safety of non-threatening citizens of all colors, class, race, and socio-economic background.

Aviation Considerations and Procedures:

A notice effective as of October 29, 2014 has permitted the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) to collect further information and service fees as regards passenger travels. The federal notice so stipulates that air carriers in particular shall be the target of said information collection procedures, fees, and protocols – especially when the involvement of foreign airlines are involved. Summary review and further information regarding the advancement and outcome of the reviews and approvals up for consideration may be further investigated by contacting the listed federal official on staff of the area also deciding on the powers of Air Marshall Services.

Federal Air Marshal Powers & Correlated Activities:

While it is no secret that the necessity of Federal Air Marshals exists, the concern for unduly and over-exuberant invasive tactics and procedures is an issue. How much leeway shall Federal Air Marshals be given? Shall the law dictate their identification at any time? Shall the public have any input or information, barring any breach of national security, in terms of frequency of their presence on air travel industrial flights? Activities listed to this end, by the Transportation Security Administration Office has designated the strategic port of Guam, authorizing affiliated Coast Guard agents to operate and establish inspection points.

Bibliography

Federal Register – The Daily Journal of the United States Government. (2015). Transportation
Security Administration Recent Documents: Request Retrieval TSA OLE/FAMS Canine
Training.
Pertains to canine training review protocols.
Federal Register – The Daily Journal of the United States Government. (2015). Collection of
Passenger Aviation Fees.
Ascertains levels and intent of passenger aviation fees, in terms of collection and imposition of
Information collection practices and policy implementation.
Proposed Rules: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (2014). Federal Register,
79(7), 1780-1791.
Provides a basis for understanding the extent of authoritative powers of Homeland Security, in
Correlation to invasive sensitivity issues.
U.S. Committee on Appropriations. (2015). Appropriations Committee releases Fiscal Year
2015 Homeland Security Bill
Current discussion and research recommendations, coming down the pike which impact invasive sensitivity issues.
U.S. Department of Interior – Transportation Security Administration. (2015). The
Transportation Security Administration Office of Law Enforcement Federal Air
Marshal Service (OLE/FAMS) – Activities in the U.S. Insular Areas of Guam,
American Samoa, and U.S. Virgin Islands
Covers information on ports of call, information gathering, and detainment of water vehicles.
White House. (2015). Fiscal Year 2015 – Budget of the U.S. Government
Knowledge of how much federal budget contributes to U.S. Transportation and security issues as may pertain to invasive outcomes.
References
Federal Register – The Daily Journal of the United States Government. (2015). Transportation
Security Administration Recent Documents: Request Retrieval TSA OLE/FAMS Canine
Training [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/12/29/2014-30395/intent-to-request-renewal-from-omb-of-one-current-public-collection-of-information-tsa-olefams
Federal Register – The Daily Journal of the United States Government. (2015). Collection of
Passenger Aviation Fees [Data file]. Retrieved fromhttps://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/10/29/2014-25663/extension-of-agency-information-collection-activity-under-omb-review-imposition-and-collection-of
Proposed Rules: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY. (2014). Federal Register,
79(7), 1780-1791.
U.S. Committee on Appropriations. (2015). Appropriations Committee releases Fiscal Year
2015 Homeland Security Bill [Data file]. Retrieved from http://appropriations.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=381268
U.S. Department of Interior – Transportation Security Administration. (2015). The
Transportation Security Administration Office of Law Enforcement Federal Air
Marshal Service (OLE/FAMS) – Activities in the U.S. Insular Areas of Guam,
American Samoa, and U.S. Virgin Islands Retrieved from
http://www.doi.gov/oia/igia/upload/25-Homeland-Security-TSA-FAMS-Briefing Paper.pdf
White House. (2015). Fiscal Year 2015 – Budget of the U.S. Government [Data file]. Retrieved fromhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2015/assets/budget.pdf