Colonial Response Essay Example

Question 1

The resolution uses a firm and inciting language to condemn the stamp act that was passed in parliament without any debate. Precisely, the resolution sparked an uproar in the United States, and everything was to be put to disposal to launch protests in order to abolish the stamp act. The stamp act was illegitimate because it sought to allow taxation of colonialists without giving any chance for representation. In normal circumstances, an act must allow for representation of the people during its passage for it to be universally acceptable. Contrary to the legal optimum, the stamp act was passed in parliament without any deliberations or debate, a situation, which resulted in the revolution.

Question 2

The public in Boston did not find the passage of the stamp act any amusing. In this respect, the public violently protested the implementation of the stamp act. Specifically, the protests constituted of both economic retaliation and violence. The people started to boycott the British goods even as the other protestors launched attacks on the homes of tax collectors. The customhouses, which served as offices for facilitating the implementation of the stamp act, were damaged in a move aimed at forcing for resignation of top officials hired to distribute the stamps. The violence continued until parliament unanimously voted to repeal the stamp act.

Question 3

The accounts represent a battle in which the various groups fight for the stamp act to ensure that the benefit comes their way. Unlike the British sons of liberty, America strategy was of little mob justice. In addition to the stamp act congress and riots, Americans merchants signed pacts to stop the importation of British commodities. Colonial pressure on the British businesspersons led to the abolition of the stamp act. Therefore, economic retaliation was crucial in mobilization of action against the stamp act.