Community And Crime Essay

It is essential to discuss the community and crimes the community members understand better the residential areas. In addition, most of them can identify well the criminals in the area thereby informing the relevant authorities. The community members tend to know their neighbors more than the security personnel due to their interactions. Therefore, for the state to eliminate crimes in an area, it is necessary to liaise with the community members because they could determine the time used in getting a criminal. However, due to the constrained relationship between the police and the public, the community members could use a different avenue of informing on the criminals. Therefore, they could use the media due to their influence in the general, and people expect them to give the news as and when they occur (Jewkes, 2004). As a result, the police could get the news from criminal activities in a certain area through the mainstream media. For this reason, the police would try to enforce law and order by arresting the criminals in order to protect the public. Nonetheless, the objective of this paper is to provide an insight in the criminal activities in the Brooklyn community in New York.
However, the Brooklyn community provides residence to many and diverse residents. For this reason, the area has language diversity because different races and people live there. Therefore, the crime rates could increase due to non-conversant of the different people around. The different cultural values could also differ in terms of what one community regards a crime. The residents there talked different languages, which included; English, Spanish, Arabic, French, Russian, Yiddish, Hebrew, Polish, Chinese, and Indians. As a result, the different communities had different places of worship like the churches, the temples, and the mosques (United States, 1980). In addition, the buildings differed depending on what the communities preferred, which in most cases they based on their cultural values.
Nonetheless, the Whites consisted of the highest percentage, followed by the Blacks. It was necessary to enhance community integration to reduce the conflict levels. The high population also strained the security personnel because it was not easy to cover the vast area populated with the different communities. Therefore, the communities needed to become patience with each other and respect the other peoples’ culture. Moreover, the buildings in the area were many due to the high population of the different races. However,some of the statistics in the crime index rates in Brooklyn entailed; murder 113 people, rape was 460 and robbery was 5,865 and assault was 10,025.
On the other hand, the buildings differed in terms of the outside appearance because; the citizenry constructed them on the basis of their familiarity backed by the cultural values. Nonetheless, the Whites’ buildings out stood the other because of the skilled manpower applied in the construction. Nevertheless, there was massive racism in the area because the Whites looked down upon the other communities and often referred to them as illiterate people with backward culture. For this reason, it created enmity and conflicts among the community members. In most cases, the Whites would exploit the Blacks and the Indians mostly because they could work on the farms, and the women would do the household chores. As a result, the maltreatment from the Whites triggered the need to revenge among the oppressed communities and it resulted in criminal activities (Stuntz, 2011). However, to enhance equality in the citizenry, the government provided public schools where the students from the poor families could access the education at cheaper prices.
Therefore, due to the different communities living in one area, a lot of racism and ethnicity is common in Brooklyn. Therefore, racism and ethnicity has become one main criminal justice problem in Brooklyn, and the police need to identify strategies to reduce it in order to enhance equality for all. Therefore, the process requires neutral lawmakers and enforcers who do not become partisans in the cases presented to them. However, the police should comprise of most of the ethnic communities to eradicate chances of self-interests and favoritism in the ruling. For instance, in the American courts, no Blacks would give testimonies or become witnesses because the judges regarded the information given as ineffective. For this reason, most of the Blacks suffered in the hands of the Whites due to the intimidation of the judges.
Therefore, the police needed to handle the ethnicity and racism by first introducing the community policing in the area thereby creating good relationships with the community members, especially from the minority groups. As a result, they would encourage the oppressed to report the cases to the police without fear of facing intimidation and harassment from the oppressors. Most of the racism cases would go unreported due to the fear the people had concerning the justice system.
On the other hand, the police could also provide a motion to the leaders for enactment and new legislation regarding how they handled the Blacks. Therefore, the leaders had the chance to deliberate in the clauses that needed redress in order to change the judges and the lawyers’ perception concerning the Blacks. Therefore, the Blacks would appreciate the police’ contribution thereby ending up developing a sense of belonging in the city (Yaro & Hiss, 1996). Consequently, it would also lead to economic developments because everyone would conduct one's business without fear of facing discrimination. Nonetheless, the police could also arrest those who practiced racism and ethnicity to warn and deter the potential criminals who took advantage of the situation to oppress the Blacks and the minority groups. The police could then prescribe the punishments to criminals, which included, fines, jails, and community servicing.
However, the government and the police should use other avenues in order to reduce the racism and ethnicity. For instance, they could embark on a campaign that informed the people of the need to eradicate the vices because they had negative impacts on both the victims and the predators. Therefore, there was to need to enhance a peaceful coexistence between the citizenry. Additionally, the state could also liaise with the humanitarian organizations to offer emotional and physical support to the victims. Therefore, it would help reduce the hatred among the people because the humanitarian organizations connect well with people because most of their staff comes from the same communities thereby understanding the people’s plights better. The state should also put strict measures, for instance, heavy punishments on those who practiced racism (Marwell, 2007). Additionally, the government needed also to incorporate the minority groups in the justice systems in order to strike a balance in the rulings that entailed racism.
In summation, for efficacy in the crime eradication, all parties should join hands because it is impossible to fight crime as an individual. Mostly, it is advisable to involve the community members in crime cases because they understand the cause and could give insights about how the criminals go about the crimes. Therefore, the police should never leave out the societies when fighting any criminal activity.

References

Jewkes, Y. (2004). Media and crime. London [u.a.: SAGE.
United States., United States., United States., United States., & United States. (1980). Justice assistance news. Washington, D.C: Public Information Office, Office of Justice Assistance, Research, and Statistics.
United States. (1991). Selected crime issues: Prevention and punishment : hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime and Criminal Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Second Congress, first session, May 23, 29; June 12, 26; July 10, 17, and 25, 1991. Washington: U.S. G.P.O
Stuntz, W. J. (2011). The collapse of American criminal justice. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Yaro, R. D., & Hiss, T. (1996). A region at risk: The third regional plan for the New York – New Jersey - Connecticut metropolitan area. Washington, DC [u.a.: Island Press.
Marwell, N. P. (2007). Bargaining for Brooklyn: Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.