Criminal Justice And Security Goals And Challenges Research Paper Examples

Introduction

The paper will elucidate strategic goals and objectives that reflect the priorities of the President, the Attorney General, and Department components. For instance, Department of Justice components normally and routinely operates in under law enforcement as well as the administration of justice. The paper will provide an insight on the comparison and contrast of the private security entities and criminal justice organization in different perspectives.

Criminal Justice and Private Security Goals and Challenges

On the other hand, private entities aim to be efficient, effective and fair in regulation of the private security entities. Both criminal justice organizations and private security they have essential leadership responsibilities to ensure that the law enforcement is complied. The first strategic goal in both is terrorism prevention that enhances the national security (Cole & Smith, 2010). This is consistent with the rule of law. The main objectives of the first goal are to prevent, disrupt and defeat terrorist operations before they happen. Prosecute terrorist offenders.
The second goal in criminal justice organizations is to prevent crime, as well as protecting the rights of citizens in United States; this is by enforcing federal law. The main objectives of the goal are to fight the incidence or any threat of violent crime. Fighting illegal drugs threats and trafficking. Also, the goal has a purpose of fighting the corruption, international organized crimes, and economic crimes. The goals ensure that the American’s civil rights are protected and protected.
The third goal ensures and supports the fair, efficient, and transparent administration of justice at the federal, state, local, and transnational levels. This goal main objective is to strengthen as well as promoting strategies and relationships for the administration of justice with state, local, and international law enforcement (Cole & Smith, 2010). The goal ensures that judges, witness, and other participants are protected in federal proceedings. The also protects detainees awaiting trial or sentencing as well as in those in custody by offering humane, safe, and secure confinement.

Differing goals and objectives of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies

The main difference regarding the goals and objectives of the private security entities and the criminal justice organizations is on the profitability. The private security entities’ goals and objectives are focused on building the relationship with their customers and formulating measures that attract the potential clients. In addition, the objective of the private security in the federal, state and local criminal justice is to provide security services that are non-inherent to government agencies. The contracted security entity must comply with the standards that are common to all entities, irrespective of the contract. According to the Department of Defense, misconduct by one private entity affects all the entities in the organization. While the criminal justice organizations can combat economic crimes, corruption, and international organized crimes, the private entities objectives and goals are not strong enough to perform such actions. The criminal justice organizations have differing goals that prosecute the participants of terrorist acts and preventing, disrupting, and defending terrorist operations prior to their occurrence. Also, the criminal justice organizations aim to adjudicate the immigration cases punctually and independently to conform to the due process, contrary to the private entities.

Challenges facing federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies

One of the common challenges is deputizing in which the private security and other organizations may result to force multiplier for the homeland security. Consequently, the homeland security services might result in ambiguous regulatory and legal grounds. For instance, the current number of the private security officers in the United States is outdoing the police officers. These security officers are exercising legal powers that are not clearly defined by the fourth and fifth amendments of the constitution. For example, in some contexts, the security officer may perform limited searches to a civilian. Therefore, it is not clear on the ground that such security officers may perform such actions, hence the ambiguity. In addition, the private security entities are challenged by the chain of command in all federal, state and local level. Contrary to the criminal justice organizations, it is not clear to whom the security officers report to. In the federal level, the law enforcement officers are challenged by the intelligence capacity to offer sufficient an effective intelligence products. In the all levels the criminal justice organizations and private security entities required new commitments by law enforcement managers and executive to increase information sharing (Homeland Security Affairs, 2012). The cyber security is also an increasing threat to the United States, and the law enforcement agencies have failed to provide effective solution.

Roles of courts with respect to public safety and civil rights

Criminal Justice and Private Security courts main role are to ensure that federal and state laws are enforced and defend the interest of the United States. This provides the country with an essential tool by which the nation seeks order and stability. Therefore, the court systems ensure that public safety and civil rights are protected against foreign and domestic threats. The federal courts provide Federal leadership in controlling and preventing crimes. They also punish the offenders of unlawful behavior therefore ensuring fair and unbiased administration of justice for all citizens.
Both federal and state organizations participate in criminal investigations as well as law enforcement relationships with the governments and international organizations. However, the courts are different not only from structures but also judges’ selections, and types of cases heard. In federal courts the cases heard are cases regarding federal laws and treaties (Cole & Smith, 2010). Also, cases that contract with the constitutionality of a law. The court also deals with dispute between states. While on the state and local courts most cases concern state laws only, criminal cases and family law cases.

Objectives of probation, parole, and correctional organizations in regard to public safety and individual rights.

The main objective of the probation, parole and correctional facilities is to maintain and develop public safety and individual rights. The public safety is provided by the supervision of the adult criminals in parole and probation jurisdiction. Another main and important objective of these facilities is to enhance victim restoration. This can be achieved through mediation between victims and offenders, community and victim restoration boards, victim impact panel, and restitution payments. These facilities also ensure there is an enhanced communication with the criminal justice system so that individual rights are respected. Through the assigned officers in the facilities ensure that the community is protected and also assist the parolees, prisoners, and probationers to become law-abiding and productive citizens (Alaska Department of Correction, 2015).

The privatization of government services with respect to policing, courts and corrections.

Historically, the services from police forces, courts, and corrections institutions have been operated and owned by the government. However, due to increasing complexity, size, unresponsiveness, and expense of the government services concerns have been raised by privatization. Today, the number of security officers have increased to replace the police, especially in the corporate settings and gated communities. In addition, private military services are contracted to perform the action that are performed the military. The private institution is assigning contracts with the government to establish for-profit prisons. Although court systems are commonly privatized, concerns have be raised to make them private entities too.

The role of private security

Private security has become a prevalent feature of United States security policing. The main role is to recognize public safety threats, applying suitable physical limitation when necessary, and enforce laws (Cole & Smith, 2010). The entity is also required to report damage of property, unusual occurrences, and theft. Another legal responsibility of corporate security is to maintain regulations and ordinations and report prisoners or persons who require protection.
Conclusion

References

Alaska Department of Correction. (2015). Goals & Objectives | Probation & Parole | Alaska Department of Corrections. Retrieved from http://www.correct.state.ak.us/probation-parole/goals-objectives
Cole, G. F., & Smith, C. E. (2010). The American system of criminal justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Homeland Security Affairs. (2012, October). Public-Private Partnerships in Homeland Security: Opportunities and Challenges | HOMELAND SECURITY AFFAIRS. Retrieved from https://www.hsaj.org/articles/233