Ethical Dilemma In The Movie Unthinkable Essays Example

An ethical dilemma presents as a situation in which a very complex situation always involves technicalities in the presentation of mental conflict on what happens compared to what ought to be happening (Halse and Honey, 2014). Therefore, in the definition of a dilemma, there needs to be a show or evidence of the situation that is wanting of a number of calls that are limited to time. Equally, this is limited to equity or fairness to the contents of humanity and rationality. With the incorporation of ethics into the definition of a dilemma, the reality is that in ethical dilemmas, the conflict arises amongst issue of rationality, integrity, compromise or the choice or one human life being more important that another as will be seen in this ethical analysis.
The film unthinkable casts one of the present day predictions of what a dilemma in three different perspectives will be created, this situation is very possible. The character of H present as one of a Christian, who does not sympathize with the Muslim radicals and their sympathizers. The second one comes out in the character of Yusuf, who is a Muslim and only seems to value the lives of his children even when made to choose his interests to the life of his wife. The third effect of ethical concern comes with the reality that the government is reported as choosy and selfish when it comes to the lives of its citizens. Keeping in mind Yusuf is an American citizen and seems aggrieved in the manner in which the government handles Muslims.

Critical Analysis of the Ethical Dilemmas

The torture scene presents the best of these concerns. Yusuf states that he let himself get caught so that he could face his oppressors. In particular, this revelation sets the scene for numerous other accounts of ethical concerns.
Rationality – looking at Yusuf, there is no rationality in his statement; this is because there is no logic though in seeking to face an oppressor with the power and might they have as the United States.
Virtues – the movie’s plot itself defines a disturbing concern. In choosing between the Muslims and the Americans, who is the real terrorist, the Muslims kill the innocent and accuse the American of the same.
Openness – Yusuf also creates the reality check status that is too much to handle even for the authorities. He remains calm and openly answers everything except where the bombs are. Looking at how the movie ends, he finally bows to telling the truth, but conceals the fifth one, which explodes, and he hits his targets twice.
Morality – In ethics, morality is upheld. In this presentation, H seems to be the solution to the moral degrades in Yusuf; yet, he also portrays a defiant character in morality. He is ruthless to the point of seeing no value in human life when his irrationality comes out in the interrogation as he kills Yusuf wife.
Impartiality – impartiality defines the manner in which a character will be undeterred to deviate from his or her thoughts (Pollock, 2013. H and Yusuf show this discretion in this film. However, much one will try to convince them of rationality on the other side; they only will not change their judgment.
Inconsistency – looking at the character of Brody, this reflects very well. In interrogation, she is concerned of Yusuf being tortured. Later on, she changes with the bombing. At a later stage, when he commits suicide, she is sympathetic and fails to understand why the man had so much hate in his heart for America.
Least harm – this gradually builds on the concerns of H. In interrogation H believes in the thought of doing all possible to even killing Yusuf’s family to get the four bombs. In his thoughts, this is less harm compared to what Yusuf will do to the people of America. The question, therefore, develops, is one justified in taking a life to save another or others.
Confidentiality – the point at which H promises not to kill Yusuf children defines this best. It is evident that torture in the physical manner was not working which is equally not ethical. Nevertheless, they force him to believe that the kids will also face the same fate to the mother. This is very unfair ethically, and a position of the children subjected to seeing their father in that state explicitly might create more harm in their minds as they grow up as psychologists argue (Dudley et al., 2012).
Equality – the United States government comes out as an institution devoid of equity. It is much unfound to keep a war in the Muslim nations and fail to protect their own. This presents a dilemma of choice especially when Yusuf tables his demands. The government is made to choose between their interests or the people. The state determines its interests leaving the popular opinion that the government is not equal to its population.
Autonomy – Autonomy defines maximizing selfishness. H, the government, and Yusuf are all in this situation. The states and H fail in this choice and lose more than 50 American lives in the first bomb. The second time one can only guess what is the fatality. Looking at Yusuf, his autonomy and self-interest defines witty resilience that he even sacrifices his wife for his interest and motives.

Handling the Ethical Dilemma

If my position were within the casting of the American government, I would have preferred not to be pulled into this ethical dilemma by Yusuf. In particular, the preference would have been to meet Yusuf’s demands, and with the resources that the government has, prefer to fight this war latter. Ethically, this rationally appeals as a dilemma in itself of letting a criminal go with the Knowledge that he might do more harm. Nevertheless, my preference would have been to save the situation at the moment.

References

Dudley, M., Steel, Z., Mares, S., & Newman, L. (2012). Children and young people in immigration detention. Current opinion in psychiatry, 24(5), 285-292.
Halse, C., & Honey, A. (2014). Unraveling ethics: Illuminating the moral dilemmas of research ethics. Signs, 40(1).
Pollock, J. (2013). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminal justice. Cengage Learning.