Example Of Critical Thinking On Galileo On Nature, Scripture, And Truth
Type of paper: Critical Thinking
Topic: Galileo, Bible, Nature, Business, Government, Management, Products, Holiness
Pages: 1
Words: 275
Published: 2021/02/19
It is clear that Galileo accepts that there are inherent differences between biblical teachings and his senses. From his letter, it is evident that Galileo had initially tried to bridge the divide between his side and the interpreters of the Bible. This is evidenced by his statement that, "possibly because they are disturbed by the known truth of other propositions of mine which differ from those commonly held and therefore mistrusting their defense so long as they confine themselves to the field of philosophy, these men have resolved to fabricate a shield for their fallacies out of the mantle of pretended religion and the authority of the Bible.” Despite the numerous engagements previously pursued him, Galileo is still convinced that the two sides need to prove the reality of their ideologies based on physical conclusions founded on previous experiences, observations and experiments.
According to Galileo, a very thin line can distinguish the interrelationships between God, man, and nature. In fact, he believes one to be a product of the other, to glorify the greatness of the former. This is evidenced by Galileo’s remarks that, “I think that in discussions of physical problems we ought to begin not from the authority of scriptural passages, but from sense-experiences and necessary demonstrations; for the holy Bible and the phenomena of nature proceed alike from the divine Word, the former as the dictate of the Holy Ghost and the latter as the observant executrix of God's commands.” From the above quote, Galileo believes that if nature is a product of creation, then the same religious teachings should also prove the existence of the other biblical phenomenon that do not concur with his senses. This can only be done through experiments and observations.
In conclusion, it is equally easy to agree or to disagree with either biblical teachings or Galileo's senses. In fact, both schools of thoughts require further justifications in order to win opposing entities to either side.
- APA
- MLA
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Chicago
- ASA
- IEEE
- AMA