Example Of Essay On Teamwork

The team of research was useful because it observed a number of teamwork principles. For instance, the team had well-defined goals that every team member had the interest in researching as stated by (Bush, 2008). Each of the members of the groups focused on satisfactory completion of the research under the outlined goals. The aim of the team was to research on Shanghai Jahwa United Co Ltd in particular countries and draw the conclusions in the end. In addition, the team worked on well-defined standards of effectiveness. The group tried to define the expected outcome of the research work prior to the commencement. Further incorporation of well-defined quality methods of teamwork research enhanced the effectiveness. As such, the team was effective in the study.
The role of leaders of any team that is effective is the maintenance of closeness to the members in order to offer support and technical assistance. The leader of a research team organizes their members, creating a coalition of supporters and collaborators. They offer support and assistance to the members whenever required. In addition, the leaders participate actively in the research that the members are undertaking.
Every member present in a team assists another member in the same group. Therefore, the team members provide a collaborative environment where the members are interdependence as seen from (Bush, 2008). Members consult each other and discuss the solution to the research challenges. For this reason, they enhance the research work under the pre-defined goals.
The members who form a research team possess skills and effort of input at a personal level that they combine when they form a team to provide exemplary results. An individual can identify their skills by speaking out to the team members about their skills and qualification. Additionally, they can put more effort in sections that require the skills that they possess while the members follow to gain similar skills. A different member will be more skillful on a different topic under the research work. For this reason, they will be required to enlighten the entire team on the same including the practical application of the skills to enhance understanding. Therefore, every member of a team understands where they belong in terms of skills and the collective effort for the success of the team.
Team development was possible because of the availability of a common source of coordination, that is, the team leader. The leader inter-linked the member of the groups with a consistency observation of the set goals. Organized in groups of two, every member of the team had an opportunity to grow by participating in the research work. The members supported one another in the research under the schemes of interdependence. Members would consult and offer consultancy. They would find time and discuss some of the coverage in their research work especially where a member raised concern. As stated by (Sheard, 2009), the team developed beyond the research assignment boundaries to social levels. Members would hang out for dinner after long days of research where they shared in the fun and discussed other things in life. As such, the team was able to develop significantly.
According to (Bush, 2008), every individual in a team portrays commitment for the attainment of the team goal. They actively take part in the affairs of the group. The collective actions of the team aim to the development of a practical purpose of management that is meaningful and defined. As such, actions such as the development of the appropriate directions and momentum are inclusive. Furthermore, the team develops actions to explore, develop, and shape the team actions and purpose. The input at the individual level has recognition and acknowledgment by a team. Therefore, the definition of the collective actions of a team gets clarity.
Individuals attribute to significant changes of the groups they participate in the research work. According to (Bush, 2008), the group dynamics is dependent on the team leader, the idea of the majority, the environment of research, persuasion, and the attitudes and behaviors of the individual members. The attributes of the team leader define the direction of steering that the team will assume. They give the appropriate directives to the team members expected to follow. The inspirations of the leader determine the level and the rate of change in the group. The leader persuades the members to take actions or follow certain principles in the line of the team goals. In addition, majority of the members can propose a change that the leader evaluates and implements for the sake of positive achievement by the research team.
Some of the techniques employed in the teamwork include focus on the main goal and proper leadership of the members. In addition, there is the definition of policies and procedure, and creation of understanding among the group members as stated by (Sheard, 2009). The group cannot achieve if it captures irrelevant details in their research. As such, there is need to familiarize oneself with the goals of the group at frequent intervals so that the coverage is always relevant. Every member of the group observes the predefined policies and procedures of the research. Members should also understand each other clearly in the preliminary stages of research so that they are aware of the appropriate parts that each should contribute. The incorporation of these techniques enhances the achievement of the objectives of the team.

References

Bush, George Pollock, and Lowell H. Hattery. 2008. Teamwork in research. Washington: American Univ. Press.
Sheard, Geoff, Andrew Kakabadse, and Nada Kakabadse. 2009. Leadership teams Developing and sustaining high performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.