Francis Bacon: Attack On Authority And Advocacy Of Experimental Science Essays Example

What intellectual attitude did Francis Bacon believe obstructed new scientific discoveries in his time?

Although he made a lot of discoveries in absence of a scientific library, Mr. Francis Bacon considered himself not as a scientist. His strong advocacy for the modern scientific methods made him to be regarded as a prophet who foresaw the nurturing of the current science. He says that although the Aristotle’s had taught the world long ago, he is warning the people against being tied up to only one way of thinking. Therefore, most of Bacon’s insights were in a way trying to express the many scientific ideas in the form of aphorism. In addition, he effortlessly criticized the many contemporary methods that were being used as scientific tools of studies. He calls the Aristotle’s opinions as self imposed servitude. He says that to some extent, the Aristotle failed to give man the freedom to think; “as much as you may be inferior to Aristotle, you should be given a chance to challenge the nature by showing him that you are not inferior in everything. It should let be known to him that you are a head of him in some matters if not most as a result of lifetime experiences, exposures and experiences.”

What method of scientific enquiry did bacon advocate?

What connections can you make between this document and the present?
Francis Bacon’s Attack on Authority and Advocacy of experimental Science has comprehensively elaborated need of self reliance and change of thoughts. It clearly brings out the captivity we, as the current generations are in. we are living in a generation that is full of pessimism, the main mentality being that the ancient scientists had exhausted the scientific inventions. But according to Mr. Bacon, the case is quite different and that’s why he is calling upon each person to come out and strive to studying nature in depth, instead of relying in the previous inventions. It’s quite clear and worth noting that the sciences we are currently relying on are mere systems that were put in order to harmonize and set forth what had been previously invented, but not methods and studies on how to make inventions. Such system has left us as servants and fixers of the errors that had been made by these scientists of the old days, but not helping us quench our thirsts for finding more scientific truths. Therefore, the system is doing us more harm than good. We have been hoodwinked to regard such scientific innovations as noble and irrevocable.

Work Cited

Winks, Robin W, and Thomas Kaiser. Europe, 1648-1815: From the Old Regime to the Age of Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. Print.