Free Essay About Michael Godbout Discussion 8

The Gospel of John is a bold and impressive choice for the reduction of the canon of Scripture to one book. I applaud this, since it is not one of the synoptic gospels and draws its material from various sources. Your choice is based on facts and where there are disputes you have noted them. For example, the date it was authored, most scholars believe that Mark is the earliest written book of the four gospels. I would have loved for you to explore more criteria for the gospel of John since you provide an interesting read. Not only is the Gospel of John a testimony of Jesus but it is also a testimony of a possible present and future life through Christ (Johnson 551).

Patricia Recupero discussion 8

The work is a comprehensive appreciation of the various choices in the scriptures such as Genesis, Romans, Mark and John. You have acknowledged well the strengths of various books such as John and Romans. It is a general account and does not delve specifically to why you thought the Gospel of Luke is the best choice. The criteria given are in context to all the gospels or contrasting the epistles and do not pinpoint to Luke.

Paula Jo Reed discussion 8

I love the way you have elaborated on the message offered by the book of Romans. The doctrines, interpretations and teachings it offers to Christians are valuable and practical. You have stated that the book of Romans is not easy to understand. I think that the choice should be simple and easy to comprehend to facilitate in teaching and spreading the message to the present and future generations. Additionally, the fact that it was written for people who were already Christians limits the scope of audience. The Christian faith is founded on Jesus and his teachings. Therefore an account of this is crucial in a book that summarizes the New Testament canon of scriptures.

Cory Gloeckner discussion 8

I opine think that Hebrews is an interesting choice of summarizing the canon of scriptures. I like the way you have accepted its outright limitations in regards to this discussion while still taking up the challenge to argue its credibility. However, the book of Hebrew is an account after the fact; it is an interpretation that does not illustrate the actual teachings of Christ. You have not explained the exact criteria you used in arriving at the book of Hebrew. You have excellently examined the content of Hebrew and not specifically why it is the best choice. I love the way you have illustrated how Hebrews connects the Old (Messiah, Lamb of God) and New (Savior) Testament by using the various designations of Jesus (Johnson 409-417).

Work cited

Johnson, Luke. The Writings of the New Testament. 3rd Edition. Fortress Press, 2010. Print.