Free Essay About Reason And Nature
Type of paper: Essay
Topic: Life, Existence, Nature, Isaac Newton, Theory, Science, World, Relationships
Pages: 3
Words: 825
Published: 2020/11/20
This article is set to analyze various aspects from Isaac Newton’s point of view in relation to the diverse issues that are in existence that many individuals have failed to properly understand. The issues addressed in his views are based on an intelligent perspective as he tries to state that there must be an omnipresent being. This is because there exists numerous things in the world that cannot be explained based on a scientific perspective.
Over the years, it has been a pressing matter to try and explain numerous things that are in existence, this is what drove to the various theories that have been developed to explain the very existence of nature itself. This is evident in Newton’s argument where he persistently tried to state that there exists numerous issues that cannot be explained through Science. This is evident through his arguments where he tries to give examples through animals and other matter that make up nature. Through the argument that he presents, he makes it clear that there are things that cannot be scientifically be explained. Through the details that he puts forth, he states that, in spite of the numerous theories that have been established, there is no argument that has properly addressed the existence of nature and its various components.
He provides a detailed argument where he gives proper examples that clearly illustrates and puts his argument across. Through his detailed arguments, he being a philosopher and a learned person states that there exist things that cannot be explained. Through the details that are presented, which are clearly put where the solar system and various matter which compose of the universes are put to reasoning cannot be explained. This is because there exist no proper theory that can give a proper explanation that gives detailed account of the various aspects of nature. It is due to this reason that his argument has received positive critics since it has addressed issues relating to nature at a more reasonable perspective.
It is needless to state that, despite the role Science has played in the modern world in trying to explain different things that are in existence, there are issues that cannot be scientifically addressed. This has been evident in relation to nature and other matters in the world. For example, there have been numerous theories that have been developed to challenge the biblical theory of creation. However, despite this claims that have been made by different philosophers and other individuals, there has been no proper explanation that has explained the existence of man and the universe. It is due to this reason that his argument and his point of view has been credited to be quite reasonable. This is because he owns up to the fact that there must be the existence of an omnipresent and supernatural being that must have been involved in the development of the universe. This is because there are some mechanical things that are involved in human beings and the solar system that science cannot explain.
In relation to other theories and arguments, the writers do not give proper account of a wide range of things that are in existence. For example, despite the argument that is presented about human beings and various mechanical things that are involved in the bodies, there are no detailed accounts provided. Through not providing detailed information, it is quite evident that there exists a loophole that questions the credibility of the argument that the various writers try to put across. Credibility is questioned to limited limit since he credits the existence of certain things that are in existence to an omnipresent thing.
Despite the numerous space explorations that have been made to outer space, there still exists some queries that have been left unanswered. This is made clear by Isaac Newton’s argument where he states that the same theories that try to explain the existence of the universe are not credible. This is from the perspective that there are numerous controversies surrounding the arguments presented. It would, therefore, be appropriate to state that, despite Isaac Newton’s argument not being properly detailed, there exists room for numerous possibilities. This is because giving credit and acknowledging the existence of an omnipresent being would explain numerous things. It is true that science has played a major role in trying to provide answers that have raised a lot of controversies. Credit needs be given to the numerous individuals who have made endless effort to try and give answers. It is quite evident that there are accounts in relation to nature that cannot be truly explained through science.
It is due to the reasons that have been presented in this paper that it is proper to state that Isaac Newton’s argument is more credible. This is through the acknowledgment that has been made despite the numerous theories that have been developed by various writers that the relationship between reason and nature is diverse. In essence, the relationship between reason and nature cannot be truly explained through a scientific perspective.
- APA
- MLA
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Chicago
- ASA
- IEEE
- AMA