Free Essay On Common Sense Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine was one of America’s greatest independence fighters, by means of his thorough knowledge of the English language. He wrote Common Sense as a literary armament in the aim of overwhelming Great Britain, and defeating her as America’s superior commander. His goal was the usage of language to examine a nation already entangled in war, to arise together in the grounds to battle cruelty. “Common Sense” worked an essential part in the American Revolution. The pamphlet overwhelmed numerous readers through its application of rhetoric, to defame Great Britain, and marks her as a oppressor, a monster, and a bother. This paper discusses about how Thomas Paine applied this capability for rhetoric and linguistic knowledge to make one of the one of the world’s greatest commanding and effective parts of propaganda over the usage of numerous themes.
Paine instigates by differentiating between society and government. According to Paine to Paine, Society is everything handy and good that individuals link together to accomplish. Government, conversely, is an organization whose single resolve is to safeguard us from our own evils. Government has its roots in the wicked of man and is consequently a needed evil at finest. Paine states that government's only drive is to care for life, freedom and possessions, and that it should be judged merely on the root of the scope to which it completes this aim.
The usage of the title “Common Sense” supposes that his concepts are the effect of logic and intention, imminent from simple and generally recognized facts, recognized to the majority of rational, educated individuals. Paine presents his argument by informing the person who reads of his “simple truths, plain point of view, and common sense” ( Paine 335). He pleas to the reader to set aside “prejudgment and prepossession, and grieve his purpose and his emotional state to decide for themselves”, providing the reader the choice to pay attention to his argument at a period when the king of England merely presented defeat. It is by engaging to the understanding and purpose of the common fellow that Paine emphasizes parting from Great Britain is common sense.
Paine then and there deliberates an imaginary situation in which a set of individuals has been retained on an island, and separated from the rest of society. These individuals cultivate bonds with each another, and governmental inevitably develops. Paine states the individuals will be much better-off if they are in control for the formation of the laws that regulate them. Paine is correspondingly indirectly in contention that such a scheme of representation is likewise better for the American colonizers. As Paine was able to express his deviation with British control in America, he continues to unveil a wide-ranging attack on the British scheme of government. Paine states the British structure is excessively complicated and predominant with inconsistencies, and that the monarchy is allowed far too much authority. The British scheme play-acts to deal a judicious scheme of checks and stabilities, but in reality, it is devoid of it.
Paine had to plea the common man and resolved whatever movements they should yield for the sake of their children. “The sun on no occasion shined on a reason of grander value”, states Paine (336). He further expressed that this same sun will gleam on coming generations and this generation will have to resolve whether their youngsters experience the existence in freedom or will still be under the oppression of England. He drove on to express that the future generation will profit or agonize for the people’s action or inaction, that successors will eventually discover about indecisiveness (Paine 336). Paine contends that the current state of the government is not consistent enough to “which we may confer on to future generations” (Paine 339). The subject of posterity is applied all the way through Common Sense to sort the reader conscious of one’s successors.
Paine stated that the colonies have little to achieve from continuing involvement to Britain. Business can be well directed with the rest of Europe, but first America should be self-governing. Paine also stressed that if the colonies continue to be committed to Britain, the unchanged difficulties that have ascended in the past will rise in the future. Paine contended that it is essential to pursue freedom at the present, as to fix then would merely for a short time conceal complications that will certainly come back.
Thomas Paine, in his compelling message Common Sense, expends his extraordinary literary ability to carry the American individuals in contrast to a collective adversary, the cruelty of England, but most significantly in contrast to the dictatorship of the royal monarchies of Europe. The usage of numerous subjects in Common Sense exemplifies the contradiction of the independence and principles of the New World, as opposed to the tyranny and oppression of the Old World over the practices of literary skill. In Common Sense, Paine completed the basic explanations between the division of the colonies and the mother country in connecting England with the conduct and deeds of bullies, giving her the brand of an abominable creature, and portraying the king of England as a bother merely worried with benefiting upon the possessions that the colonies would carry to him. In Common Sense, Thomas Paine, without a doubt applied this skill for rhetoric and linguistic knowledge to make one of the one of the world’s furthermost commanding and operative parts of propaganda over the application of numerous literary subjects. This concept was so illustrated as Paine strongly specified that, by proclaiming freedom, America will be capable to search for the aid of other nations in its fight for independence. For all of these causes, Paine stated it is vital and serious that the colonies assert freedom.

References:

Szilvia Csábi. “A Cognitive Linguistic Approach to the Study of the American War of Independence: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense”. <http://www.pala.ac.uk/uploads/2/5/1/0/25105678/csabi.pdf
Melanson, J. R. “A Literary Analysis of Thomas Paine’s Common Sense. (American Literature I)”. November 18, 2011. <http://josephrmelanson.blogspot.com/2011/11/literary-analysis-of-thomas-paines.ht ml
Scott Locklear. "Extended Summary" eNotes Publishing Ed. eNotes.com, Inc. eNotes.com 24 Feb, 2015 <http://www.enotes.com/topics/common-sense#summary-summary>
SparkNotes Editors. “SparkNote on Common Sense.” SparkNotes.com. SparkNotes LLC. n.d.. Web. 23 Feb. 2015.