Good Applying Technique Of Focus Group In An Ongoing Research Project Research Paper Example

Introduction

The method of focus group applies itself in order to uncover the hidden linkages those dwell amongst various variables of interest. The logical and empirically developed studies in the social sciences are necessary in order to entertain the measurable side of the field. The literature of other types does not have an empirical direction to itself, and therefore, one’s thoughts are sufficient in order to develop a masterpiece.
The researcher’s thoughts alone in the realm of science will not stand a chance of acceptance on the grounds that there is a significant chance of baseness if the involved scholar could not substantiate his or her findings in the light of statistical theory. On the basis previous discussion, one should wonder that why we need focus groups in order to study a set of relations material to a scientific study? The researcher cannot develop a background of his or her research in the air, and therefore, he or she has to study the relevant environment in order to identify the problem that needs a solution. Secondly, the researchers have to evaluate different socialistic and organizational claims.
I have decided to investigate an organizational and cultural claim that was about leader’s role in terms of supporting creativity in the employees, and I had to fill in the blank by adding an attribute of teamwork to the study because the leader cannot practice the art and science of influence if he or she does not have a team of workers engaged under him or her. Furthermore, I realized while crafting my paper that fearful and authoritative leaders cannot reach effectiveness because they force others into servitude rather than giving them the motivational reasons to follow them in order to achieve greatness. The famous leaders have equally significant followers, and therefore, greatness is infectious in nature.
However, the cowards lack the power of finding success either in the role of trailer or as a leading entity. The fearless individuals create confidence, and feared ones breed fearsome thoughts and philosophies. The employees were requesting that the leaders have to bless their followers with the gift of confidence and empowerment so indirectly, they were pointing out to the fact that their leader is an ineffective one because she does not have any sense of delegation, and therefore, the jobs do not have the enjoyable dimension to them. The teachers in the college were boring themselves out because they had to manage a dictated routine daily so creative sense inside themselves is dying out with the passage of time. Humana always respond to an emotional appeal that should have an envisioned exterior, and people need to transform into the part of any moment that has a much larger stature as compared to theirs.

Application of Focus Group

I have conducted my focus group interview when I was in search of an issue, and I have reviewed a significant amount of literature in this regard. However, I could not hunt down an interesting area for the investigation because I fell into the trap of thinking that there was not a single literally gap present that I could fill from my research effort. I was in my room one day, and was worriedly pondering about the ways those can help me in terms of dragging my dying project forward. I decided to conduct a focus group study, and I had made decision to tag my friend along who was supposed to take on the role of a moderator in the discussion.
The day was Monday, and it was bright morning. I took a few sandwiches along with me because I have heard that gatekeepers test the patience of the researchers so I thought of the adventure as a challenging one for my stomach. I have communicated with my friend on the phone, and she was waiting for me at a local community college, and we have already arranged an appointment with the Principle by email. She was anticipating our arrival at 9 in the morning, and we were at her office half an hour early.
Then, we had to wait, and the residence of the office came to her desk in 15 minutes, and we were nervous because she had a graceful yet fearful personality that made us feel creepy from the inside. We went through a sensation of having alive butterflies in our bellies, and the urge of leaving became powerful, but we received the summon from our host, and now the doors to return were closed.
We went inside the office, and the place was awesome because it was filled with paintings, and the Iranian carpet was a main highlight. The fragrance of rose was scintillating the nerves. The atmosphere was so conducive towards creativity that I would not have left the room if it was in my power.
The Principle read our disorientation, and therefore, she cleared her throat slightly in order to grab our attention. Afterwards, she presented us with elegantly designed chairs with softer futons those provided us with ease after an hour long journey from our homes to the college.
I produced an application that stated the purpose of our visit, and our host was more than happy with the perspective of helping us out so she called a staff meeting immediately, and we were in the middle of a focus group discussion before we can know it. I have posed an initial inquiry in order to stimulate the discussion through a few opening stages.
I have probed the small collective about the element of happiness that they feel while performing their jobs, and a few of them responded that when they have the freedom of developing a personalized approach in the direction of job performance then, they actually find pleasure and satisfaction in their work.
I added a subsequent inquiry that was about the role of empowerment in regards to the seeking of happiness in work, and they again responded that the leadership has to come forth in order to stimulate their deep participation in their work, and the Principles have to play and cast a notable hand during the process of providing intrinsic energy that can push the subordinates in the direction of having a belief that they have the potential of making a difference in this world. The discussion headed to the road of philosophy, but I reaped the real fruit of the conversation already.
I noted down everything, and moved to home at my earliest convenience so that I can search down constructs those can resemble the key concepts discussed during the focus group session. After 4 hours of meticulous surfing on the internet, I have found two constructs with the titles of Teamwork and Employee Creativity. The holistic picture of the planned study would reach partial illumination with availability of the featured variables so I decided to look deeper. I took a break, and I was enjoying my coffee when I read the note about the importance of educational leadership from the Principle.
I left my beverage, and returned to the computer. I searched for six hours, and dig out another useful piece of literally puzzle. The managerial leadership style completed my model of research, and now it was time for me to take some rest, and on proceeding days I worked without the sense of night and day to give my project a complete face.

Using Secondary Data

I hate to apply secondary data as an only means of conducting academic research because this approach will not permit me to add unique valuable insights in the literature, and therefore, I went to considerable lengths in order to mine relevant concept to work with. I developed the conceptual framework with the help of joining previously published research in the field of motivation.
However, I had an urge to cut down the number of constructs as the project emerged more difficult than I have expected and anticipated, but I had a firm belief that the study will put itself together eventually, and one day, my dream came true, when I understood the challenging concept of moderation after an 8 hour shift. I have used secondary researches as the sources of joining the variables together in order to form a flowing and well organized philosophical base for my investigation.