Good Essay About Ebola Health Initiative

Various community health projects that are beneficial to the larger society should be initiated; however, they should be well thought and prioritized based on the needs of the community. Community-based health care programs are some of the community projects that can be initiated as they are beneficial to its members. The health care projects provide a preventive and primary health care service that ensures the health conditions of the community members is promoted. The project also guarantees the existence of proper prevention to various chronic diseases that affect members of the society. This project paper will handle economic analysis of Ebola health initiative in community-based health care programs.
Economic analysis of Ebola has provided a joint response initiative in order to deliver services on issues of Ebola. Ebola treatment facilities, logistics hubs, and NGO offices have had reliable capacities to communication that respond to organizations that combat issues of Ebola. Logistics have been provided to cater for Internet services and coordination of relief efforts to cater for the response to outbreaks (Weinstein & Skinner, 2010). Hardest hit areas have been provided with sufficient funds that would cater for the strained influx of getting relief workers and agencies. The fragile infrastructure among Ebola hit areas does not enable sufficient rapid access and exchange of information. ICT capacity has had its economic sufficiency as a real-time case and management on tracking of finances for Ebola management. Commitments to action made conversations intervene over time and shift focus to moving forward in the economic times of supporting diseases. Trained rural women have been financed to launch services that cater for Ebola and they are well financed. The Ebola virus has been a problem for people and appeared mysteriously at random areas bringing economic effects.
Ebola has worst hit Africa, especially West Africa. The United Nations Economic Commission for Africa has accessed impacts on socio-economic levels of countries. Economically, real costs are entailed with growth and development devised, and recommendations would accompany efforts of mitigation. The Economic crisis led to an identified transmission of funds for fragile countries. Economic analysis has had a speedy geographical continence with international community’s scaling up efforts that need to be done. Prevalently, alarmism is the process of owing to the disease of Ebola related mortality, morbidity, and economic activities. Contractions of multiple cultures that cross economic institutions come with restrictions on the movement of people. The people are provided with all economic needs and their health status catered for because the Ebola restricts movement and spreads fast. Public finance in the economic analysis of community health care provision entails lower revenues (Getzen, 2010). This leads to astronomical expenditures especially in the sector of health services and puts extra pressure on balances of fiscal analysis. Economic analysis based on Ebola management resorts to external support in order to finance the gap between financial needs.
Principle of economics for assessing and evaluating the need for the Ebola community-based health care program are mostly based on principles of World Health Organization. Recognition of economic and social factors as important health determinants is a major principle of Ebola. Professionals and policy makers in this principle together with the general public should determine health. Health promotion approaches do address social and economic health determinants. This principle can address valuable roles when it comes to improving and protecting health (Weinstein & Skinner, 2010). Funding sources get to increase in demand and evidence shows that initiatives do give value for money use in healthcare. Health promotion in this principle effects evaluation in order to realize potentials that both prove value and effectiveness. The value of investments should be proved, and this must be to increase its effectiveness in the achievement of aims. To help in achievement Ebola issues based on recognition of economic and social factors; working groups on promotion should examine and evaluate current ranges on quantitative and qualitative methods. Interest in economic and social factors provides a context that assesses and understands current evaluation status. Understanding factors addresses policies, systems and settings in the promotion of health. When concerns are worked as a group, Ebola issues can be recommended for promoting general health and give a good look at the medical future.
The principle of the comprehensive framework for health promotion would ensure Ebola interventions are implemented perfectly in community-based healthcare provision. Planning and implementation of interventions can effectively address health related problems that are major today. Ebola being a major health problem it can be addressed by the mentioned principle. Leaders describe advantages of good evaluations with health promotion put on the comprehensive framework (Minkler, 2003). Comprehensive frameworks achieve goals; provide wealth, guidance and undertakings calling for greater investments in health. Comprehensive cover for health issues in Ebola handling across community-based health care programs would probably make policy makers and practitioners undertake and invest in good evaluation for promoting health. Comprehensiveness as an economic principle would thus help in proper undertakings of Ebola evaluation and promote good health.
Ebola health initiative is a microeconomic program that is based on public healthcare surveillance. Being that it would only handle communal activities practice of activities would interpret the need for interventions. The microeconomic activity could be best for surveillance and can directly measure intervention needs. The program in the community would be micro and should empower manageable decision makers to lead and manage programs more effectively by use and provision of useful evidence. Decision-making should require competence and economic motivation in order to provide microeconomic technical analyzes about Ebola. A small range of competent epidemiologists and staff who would survey for information and communicate results based on information needed for action (Fuchs, 2009). This small scale program on Ebola would also create a necessity for planning rationally with interventions and implementation activities put at the top. Being a microeconomic program, indicating measurable factors that contribute to and affect Ebola handling becomes easy in the intervention of factors. Both passive and active surveillance would be easy in this microeconomic program because just a community is involved and not the entire country. Other benefits that would come with this microeconomic program of Ebola is a routine health information system, organized health information and management n and proper categorical surveillance.
Results that would come with the Ebola initiative in the provision of the community-based health care initiative are public. Ebola and provision of community-based healthcare are public health initiatives should be evidence based when practiced. Laying out thoughts on public initiatives is often involved in providing evidences whether they satisfy communal needs or not. In analyzing public or private satisfaction, laying out general properties give strong evidence, and communal response gives feedback (Getzen, 2010). Relevant reported attributions normally include effects, attributions, consonance and representatives of programs. Such properties commonly apply to kinds of evidences that must always be approving in public opinions and reputations. Broad principles are normally applied to all evidence kinds with generalization of most prominent discussions. In order to prove that the program has worked well for the community, the Ebola menace must have its opportunities, risks, strengths and threats analyzed. Relevant reported effects should be plausible with charitable activities registered. Attributions and observations submitted evidence should be in a position to reconcile claims of charity. The public relevance should represent consonance in observing whether there are rooms for improvement and donation for help.
Financing sources for the community-based healthcare program of handling Ebola include the government, donor agencies, communal sponsorship and public-private partnership. Donor agencies can both be local and international based on the type of help requested by programs and projects. Community source of funds functions has open funding within the communal projects. An important distinctive characteristic of sourcing projects and funds in the community using community source is that the community itself commits its resources to helping members (Fuchs, 2009). The government can as well fund projects and for the case of Ebola community-based healthcare program. The government’s funding is however not direct and may at times involve other channels and more time for the funds to reach the community.
Finally, the community-based healthcare program on Ebola can affect supply and demand of health products both positively and negatively. Providing an Ebola initiative would ensure that community residents get their health needs at cheaper prices and at times free. Also, community members can have resources at their convenience. The Primary care workforce can then have a shortage of clients since community members will be in a position to have services at homes and doorsteps. Primary care systems would, however, grow within the community but decrease in the base of healthcare institutions. Human resources would involve in balancing of demand and supply, and effective and sustainable healthcare system would have right number of the mix. Demographic trends and supply and demand of goods would also grow the population and attract new recruits in balancing demand and supply chain.

References

Fuchs, V. A. (2009). Cost shifting does not reduce the cost of health care. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(9), 999–1000
Getzen, T. E. (2013). Health economics and financing (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons
Minkler, M., Blackwell, A. G., Thompson, M., & Tamir, H. (2003). Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding. American Journal of Public Health, 93(8), 1210-1213
Weinstein, M. C., & Skinner, J. A. (2010). Comparative effectiveness and health care spending—Implications for reform. New England Journal of Medicine, 362(5), 460–465