Good Essay About Five Stars: Case For Critical Analysis

Business

According to the given scenario, the main strength or the advantage of the feedback control system is that the three individuals who are evaluating the system have experience of different education system and setup. Therefore, it is highly probable that the overall evaluation of the teachers and the feedback system will be evaluated with great professionalism and diversity. In the current scenario, the feedback from the principal is 40% of overall feedback weight and according to the evaluators it is highly probable that the feedback from principal is based on the personal likings and disliking. Therefore, in these circumstances, it is highly recommended that the criteria of principal’s feedback must be defined clearly and precisely. For example, the principal must evaluate the teachers on the basis of their punctuality, professionalism, character and the knowledge of the subjects. Another flaw in the feedback system is that 30% of the feedback is based on the feedback from the master teacher from another district. Therefore, there is a chance that the master teacher from another district will give biased feedback to degrade the performance of teachers from another district. Therefore, it is recommended that instead of getting feedbacks from the master teachers of another district, the students of the same college or school provide their feedback with notes. The students of same institute will provide more relevant feedback as compared to the master teachers from another district.
The 1-5 grading system from the principals and the master teacher is a valuable part of a feedback control system for the teachers. The main reason or advantage of 1-5 grading system is that it is easy to understand and complete for the principals and master teachers as compared to giving notes and recommendations. The 1-5 grading system saves the time for the teachers and principals because such type of feedback, ask specific and relevant questions only and ask for the notes only when needed. Therefore, it is highly probable that in case of wrong or biased feedback from master teachers and principals, the authority can double check the feedback. For example, if the teacher’s feedback says that the teacher is not punctual or missing schools, the authority can check the attendance register of the school to verify the results of feedback.
The reliability of the feedback depends on the true and fair views of the principal of the institute because the principal’s reviews or feedback covers the 40% of the entire feedback. According to the knowledge of the evaluators, the principals of the institutions are from the local community and they know the teachers personally because of the strong social relations. Therefore, it is highly probable that the principals give their feedback in relation to their personal likings and disliking as compared to the actual facts and figure. For example, if the principal had issues with the parents of the teacher in the past, then it is possible that the principal will give bad feedback to that teacher. Therefore, the state must reduce the weight of principal’s feedback from forty percent to twenty percent and include the feedback from the students to critically analyze the feedback from the principal. Moreover, the state must conduct the feedback process themselves and collect the feedback as soon as possible. The feedback from the students must be kept confidential.