Good Essay On Peer Review

Cybersecurity Website for Highschool Students

Introduction
Writing
The document write-up is fair in terms of its organization of sections and grammar. The literature review section is more of an annotated bibliography that fits odd with a project document. The literature review must be part of the document itself rather than presented as an annotated bibliography. A separate work cited section must contain all the references.

Format

The format of the document is good. It has proper sections according to the flow of the document. A correct and valid table of contents is added at the beginning that correctly links each section. Some fixes in the format are required like the addition of sub-sections to major headlines. Examples are Project Plan and Evaluation sections. These sections must be elaborated according to the instructions in the course syllabus. A major flaw is that a separate references section is missing. The in-text citation is also missing for each of these references.
The topic chosen is excellent, is easy to implement in the current semester. The scope, as defined in the project document, is perfect. The topic is balanced in terms of work and scope. Additional items like testing, quality, and features like security and authentication of the website can be added. The evaluation needs to be more refined. The evaluation criteria defined is not sufficient to test the robustness of the website. Efforts must be done to get the website tested by professionals, or if cost is an issue then the website must be tested by creating a well-defined test document. Expected results are in perfect alignment with the objective of the project. The solution by the author to create a WordPress site is impressive as this would be easy and fast to implement, and WordPress is a popular means of creating websites. Although the author can also try using popular client-side validation technologies like Javascript.

Length

The paper meets the page requirement, but it does not justify each section. Literature review section is large and redundant. It does not provide any further value to project design or implementation. The literature review can be shortened by getting only a gist from all references and other important sections of Project Plan, Evaluation, Risks and Issues, Outcomes and resources can elaborated to add more details.

Intellectual Content

The paper presents the topic in a very impressive format. Opening part of the paper puts the objective and aim of the project in a clear, concise form. The author knows the topic and is aware of ways to create a website, and ways to test the website. The references section is not good at all, and it simply lists down other’s work without deriving a value for the described project. The Author can create a better document by eliminating the annotated bibliography style of the literature review instead of simply presenting a gist of all the references cited. The references can be integrated into each section of the document to get ideas for implementation and evaluation of the topic.
I very much liked the idea, its presentation and covering of each applicable section to achieve the objective. I learned how a website could be implemented using WordPress. I would like to be a user of the proposed website and enhance my knowledge. The idea of evaluating and testing the website through a survey by the users itself (in this case the high school students), is unique and very interesting.

References

The document lacks figures. Adding some screens about the proposed website will make the document more presentable. There is only a single table in the Project Plan section, which is also not sufficient to detail the project plan. More tables must be added like in the evaluation section where the author described the survey method of evaluation.