Good Essay On Why Or Why Not?

Should individuals who practiced enhanced interrogation under the Bush administration when trying to extract information from suspected terrorists, be permitted amnesty today?
The criminal investigation agencies have been rampant in their activities to curb and reduce the number of offenders of the law, through using forensic means, among other methods for the operations.
Extracting information from viewers through the agency officials help in the critical information for the same society that struggles with terrorism and other criminal offenses. The suspected terrorists should always have a target of stabilizing the security system through the CIA that manage to curb such attacks. In the event of promoting unity and enacting laws suitable for the state and international benefits, people often explore on the tactics the terrorists use to attack.

It is vital for individuals to have permission from the Bush administration on the need to carry on either the investigation process of other terrorist’s attacks that occur from the society that has limited security stability. Organizing the accountability of these individuals to show up, will create a situation of common ground where criminal justice system and the community work together for the benefit of curbing terror.
Terror attacks have been rampant in the current 21st century, and the technological innovations that help with the military support and effects to carry on the attacks, have unfortunately, been successful. The administration of the current government and the future authority and leadership organization should stabilize the systems through actual transition from both parties. The terrorists CIAs who act as undercover, should always be interrogated to ascertain the need for quality confidentiality and accountability in several situations facing the United Stets among other countries dealing with terrorism.