Good Example Of Essay On Research Analysis

Abstract

The paper analyses the research conducted to determine good service in healthcare. The study was conducted as follow-up on previous research which indicated that good service contributes to the quality of care and is important especially in cases of long-term illnesses. The study therefore seeks to explain exactly what constitutes good and bad care. The research utilizes secondary data from previous research. The results are that children valued a positive healthy relationship with caregivers while parents valued integrated services that suit their circumstance and clinicians on the other hand valued cooperation from parents. The research conclude that it is important to effect changes in the manner in which caregivers and patients relate, and for people to equipped with the relevant skills.

Evaluate the title

The title of the research paper is ‘What makes for a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ pediatric diabetes service from the viewpoint of children, young people, careers and clinicians? A synthesis of qualitative findings.’ It summarizes the research objectives, scope and participants adequately. Upon reading it, one is able to tell what will be covered and from what angle the research will be approached.
Abstract
The abstract is not necessarily intriguing. It states the scope of the research paper and the background in simple clear terms. It is however, commendable that the paper does this in a few simple lines that are easily understood by the reader. It gives the objective in a simple line, in a unique way that does not state the obvious. It simple states the importance of good care that has necessitated the research. The methodology is not stated under a distinct sub-heading but it is mentioned under ‘design and objectives.’ No detailed information is provided as it only states that the research was conducted through the study of previous research papers and interviews from stakeholders. The abstract gives an elaborate clear summary of results, mentions the limitations of the study and gives conclusions on the recommendation made.

Introduction.

The study seeks to establish a systemic qualitative approach to pediatric patient care .The purpose is made clear, that is, to improve the quality in the care of patients. There are no underlying theories described in the paper. The authors state that the study goes beyond what was previously done as it departs from the localized approach to a more holistic universal approach to qualitative care and how it would impact long-term health care (Curtis-Tyler, Arai, Stephenson & Roberts, 2015).

Literature Review

Research Question/Hypothesis/Objective.
Methodology.
The study utilizes secondary data analysis which is more effective that a primary research. It analyzes previous data available on patient care and feedback on qualitative care. The research is descriptive, though this is not mentioned but can be deduced. The limitations of the research are discussed. The populations is described and the exact sample given as 650. Since the research uses secondary evaluation, the question on validity and consent do not arise as this responsibility was with the primary research that was done. The authors, however, obtained permission to use the previous available research (Curtis-Tyler, Arai, Stephenson & Roberts, 2015).

Summary of Results.

Discussion and Conclusion.

References.

Conclusion
Application
References
Curtis-Tyler, K., Arai, L., Stephenson, T., & Roberts, H. (2015). What makes for a 'good' or 'bad' paediatric diabetes service from the viewpoint of children, young people, carers and clinicians? A synthesis of qualitative findings. Archives Of Disease In Childhood. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2014-307517