Justice - An Objective Necessity (For All). Essays Examples

Immanuel Kant Ethical Theories

Immanuel Kant Ethical Theories
Among the philosophical treatises on ethics the writings of Immanuel Kant are especially distinguished. The latter was in many ways a pinnacle of the moral philosophy of contemporary and even modern times. Among the classics of German philosophy, Kant devoted most of his time to the issue of morality (and namely its specifics), and its ethical concept. Thus this concept became the most developed, systematic and complete in his works.
In his ethics, Kant proclaims the autonomy of morality from the religion. This is a consequence of a priori nature of the moral law. While Kant does not deny the existence of God, and therefore, there is an antinomy. Kant formulates three postulates: the immortality of the soul, free will, the existence of God. These postulates are needed to explain how the real world can realize the moral law.
What controls human actions in daily life? The vast majority of actions is controlled by hypothetical imperatives, which contain certain conditions for their implementation. In his ethical teaching Kant sets vertical necessary:

Debt - subjective necessity (for myself).
Responsibilities - detalization.
Kant considers the obligation to yourself, with it he begins to build a system of duties to be the main responsibilities.
Modern studies of Kantian ethics are basically an attempt to rethink and provide new approaches of ethics’ critical reconstruction. Kant provided a starting point in the recognition of the practice through reasonable behavior. Theoretical philosophy grants us the possibility of truth and scientific knowledge, practical philosophy shows us all human practice, and consideration of the relation of freedom and the law of morality is one of the major problems in understanding Kantian practical philosophy. According to him, the unity of critical and moral philosophy is to be found in the fundamental position of a person in the world and his understanding of the unity of knowledge and thus, pushes the boundaries of behavior. Indeed, moral behavior requires not only awareness of duty, but also the practical implementation of the debt.
Ethical theories of Immanuel Kant are created on the principles of duty and moral standards. It is the responsibility of a person to show decent morals and behave according to the expectations of the community. His theory deeper separates between what is bad and good. This is what tells a person make a choice that is bad or good. (Timmermann) The result of an act is not brought into perspective, but the will or the motive behind the action is important. So it is safe to say that his theory, thus, can be applied in the contemporary policing practices to ensure that police officers work better due to the providing better services to the society. Police will be capable of making appropriate choices before doing anything in order to change a situation. A lot of problems that happen in the policing unit are blamed on lack of knowledge to make the right choices or plainly reflecting on what they want to do. This, thus, makes them commit errors that would otherwise be evaded.
It is possible to state that ethics and morality involve doing what is good or correct and is generally used to mean how individuals must act in a professional capacity (Peak, n.d.) There are 2 types of morality police deal with every day, how they react to different ethical problems show the level of integrity and or morality of the policeman. Absolute ethics is two-sided, bad or good, white or black.
The role of ethics is enormously essential to a police officer, who has to respond very fast to criminal activity, make important life-death choices and at the same time have decent legal evidence. For instance, it is unethical for a police officer to impend, attack or annoy an offender to get a confession. A policeman has a moral duty to make unbiased, without discrimination, law-abiding and justifiable judgment that must defend innocent people.
Another great example is the role of a Correctional Officer. He has to contain safety and order within the prison and consists of close contact with prisoners every day. The stress level for such people, that includes threatens, taunts and other different actions towards the Correction Officer is enormous.
Maintaining high moral standards in the place you work and among people is an administrative function with which management is charged. Failing in addressing petty bicker, hostility among the people you work with, among people you serve to, and the people you need to watch over is a failure of leadership. If policemen, judges, correctional officers (as they are leaders in some sort) do not have the courage to address such small problems issues, how is it possible to say that they would be able to make very important decisions, regarding life and death situations?

References

Timmermann, J. (2015). Simplicity and authority: Reflections on theory and practice in Kant's moral philosophy. Journal Of Moral Philosophy, 4(2), 167-182.
Peak, K. Introduction to criminal justice.