Market Efficiency And Emh Essay Samples

Executive Summary

This paper investigates the efficient market hypothesis in extreme depth. It provides a comprehensive overview of the renowned literature on this particular subject. Comparison to real market problems as well as the limitation of this model is discussed. Moreover primary empirical research is also conducted during this study.

Introduction and Intended outcomes

The efficient market hypothesis is related with the performance of values in asset markets. The expression ‘efficient market’ was originally related to the stock market, but the notion was rapidly simplified to further asset markets. A while before, the efficient market hypothesis were quiet popular amongst the scholastic financial economists. This is reflected in the famous article by Eugene Fama's (1970) named, "Efficient Capital Markets", which confirms that it is commonly assumed that securities market were tremendously effectual in replicating information about distinct stocks and concerning the stock market as a whole. The acknowledged opinion was that when knowledge appears, the information spans very rapidly and is amalgamated into the prices of securities exclusive of any postponement. “Therefore, neither technical evaluation, which is the analysis of historical stock prices in an effort to forecast forthcoming prices, nor even fundamental evaluation, which is the evaluation of financial evidence such as company earnings and asset values to assist stakeholders in choosing "undervalued" stocks, would permit an stakeholder to attain earnings larger than those that could be acquired by having a indiscriminately chosen portfolio of separate stocks, at least not with comparable risk” (Malkiel, 2003).
The efficient market hypothesis is related with the notion of a "random walk," which is a phrase roughly employed in the finance writing to describe a price sequence where all succeeding price variations signify random retreats from preceding prices. “The reason of the random walk notion is that if the stream of information is unhampered and information is directly replicated in stock prices, then tomorrow's price variation will imitate only tomorrow's information and will be autonomous of the price variations of today” (Malkiel, 2003). But information is by description volatile, and, therefore, subsequent price variations must be impulsive and random. As a consequence, prices completely imitate all identified news, and also unfamiliar financiers purchasing a varied portfolio at the display of prices specified by the market will attain a rate of return as substantial as that attained by the professionals. The purpose of this paper will be to prove that if the efficient market hypothesis holds in real life, reflecting the specific market information in terms of the stock prices.

A literature review

Historical review and Development of Market Efficiency
Pragmatic study categorized as efficient market analyses has been the topic of significant consideration in contemporary years. “Arguments concerning market efficiency initiated in the proficient investment group, mainly amongst those involved in security investigation whose aim was depicted as the identification of mispriced securities” (Graham et al, 1962). Criticizers of financial accounting criteria proposed that securities were mispriced as a result of the accounting exercises. “The experimental study on market efficiency arose in response to those arguments and headed a formal, theoretical development of market efficiency” (Briloff 1972). The aim of this section is to deliberate some significant uncertainties linked with the theory of market efficiency and to provide a specific history in the development of this notion. Market efficiency is regarded now as a characteristic of an equilibrium instrument or procedure by which security prices are fashioned. “Financiers approach the securities market with a varied set of capabilities of present and forthcoming consumptions, inclinations for present and forthcoming consumption, and opinions about prospect conditions of the world” (Beaver,1981,1961). The security prices appear in a sequence of ' spot" markets that regularly resurrect which is mostly everyday). The reviving of these markets suggests that these markets are inadequate to some extend. “Whether they authorize the similar distribution that would be reached in a comprehensive market is an alternative problem” (Arrow). In imperfect markets, prospects are shaped about forthcoming prices, and equilibrium can be categorized as reliant on on those expectancies. One of the initial deliberations of the connection amongst present prices and individuals' beliefs is showed in Muth’s study in 1961, on logical expectancies. Perhaps more important, Fama and French (1993) find that the post-1963 value premium is left unexplained by the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). Beneath ambiguity, capital market equilibrium can be categorized as a representing from capabilities, inclinations, and attitudes into prices. Persons' attitudes will be acclimatized upon the news that respectively get. “Therefore, equilibrium prices at the time t will in part alter upon the indications received at time t by each individual” (Beaver,1981,1961). Following philosophies of market efficiency did not trust unequivocally on intrinsic value and are exemplified by the succeeding explanation, which emerges in Fama (1970, p. 384):

“in an efficient market prices "fully reflect" the information available”

This explanation has been widely quoted and analyzed, by numerous experts on the basis of the fact that the expressions entirely imitate and news obtainable are imprecise and redundant. “Successive efforts to mend the definitional complications have described market efficiency as the similarity of some feature of equilibrium under two diverse information conformations” (Lintner, 1965). The three chosen comprise of similarity of principles, similarity of activities (i.e., portfolio selection), or similarity of prices. According to Banz (1981) “on average, small NYSE firms have had ominously larger risk adjusted returns than large NYSE firms over a forty year period. This size result is not linear in the market proportion (or the log of the market proportion) but is most distinct for the smallest firms in the sample. The effect is also not very steady through time”.

Random Walk and Three Levels of Efficiency Hypotheses

The most critical inference of the Efficient Market Hypothesis can be drafted in one motto of “Trusting the market prices”. Values of securities in efficient markets mirror all identified knowledge accessible to stakeholders at any given time. There is an unlikely chance of misleading stakeholders, and as a consequence, every investment in efficient markets are impartially valued. This means that the investors will get more or less equaling to what they are paying for. However, fair pricing of each security does not conclude that they will all act analogously and also the fact that the probability of increasing or decreasing prices will be similar for every security (Yaes, 1989). “Conferring to capital markets theory, the probable return from a security is mainly a function of its risk. The value of the security mirrors the current value of its projected forthcoming cash flows, which integrates many features such as volatility, liquidity, and risk of bankruptcy” (Yaes, 1989). Though, as prices are judiciously created, alterations in values are anticipated to be indiscriminate and changeable, since fresh news, by its actual type, is impulsive. Consequently stock prices are believed to trail a random walk (Yaes, 1989).
The efficient markets hypothesis forecasts that market prices must encompass all existing news at any point in time. There are, though, diverse types of news that effect security prices. Therefore, financial scholars discriminate amongst three forms of the Efficient Markets Hypothesis, conditional on whatever is intended by the expression “all available information”.

Weak Form Efficiency

The weak form of the efficient markets hypothesis proclaims that the present price entirely integrates news enclosed in the previous narration of prices simply. “This means that not one person can perceive mispriced securities and “weary” the market by scrutinizing previous prices. The weak form of the hypothesis received its name because of the fact that security prices are questionably the very open along with the fact that it is also very effortlessly obtainable portions of knowledge” (Yaes, 1989). Therefore, individual should not be adept to yield from exercising the thing that “everyone else recognizes”. However, numerous financial specialists struggle to make returns by scrutinizing precisely what this hypothesis declares is of no significance - previous stock price sequence and transaction quantity data. After compelling into explanation contract prices of scrutinizing and of swapping securities it is very challenging to make wealth on openly obtainable evidence such as the historical series of stock prices.

Semi-strong Form Efficiency

The semi-strong-form of market efficiency hypothesis advises that the present price entirely integrates all widely obtainable news. “Communal news comprises not only past prices, but also data described in a company’s financial statements (annual reports, income statements, filings for the Security and Exchange Commission, etc.), earnings and dividend publications, publicized merger plans, the financial condition of corporation's competitors, anticipations concerning macroeconomic aspects (such as inflation, redundancy), etc” (Yaes,1989). In circumstance, the communal news does not even have to be of a sternly financial type. The proclamation following semi-strong market efficiency is that one should not be capable to yield consuming the things that “everyone else identifies” (the news is communal). However, this postulation is way sturdier than weak-form efficiency in comparison. “Semi strong efficiency of markets entails the presence of market specialists who are not only financial economists capable to understand associations of massive financial information, but also macroeconomists, specialists proficient at considerate procedures in product and input markets” (Yaes,1989). Debatably, gaining of these kind of skills essentially takes a lot of time and exertion. In supplement, the “communal” news may be moderately problematic to assemble and expensive to develop.

Strong Form Efficiency

The strong form of market efficiency hypothesis presents that the present value entirely integrates all current news, together public as well as private (occasionally named inside information). “The chief disparity amongst the semi-strong and strong efficiency hypotheses is that in the later situation, not one person must be capable to methodically create incomes even if trading on news not freely recognized at the time” (Yaes,1989). This means that the strong form of EMH says that a firm's administration (insiders) are not be capable to methodically advantage from inside news by purchasing firm's right after the company deliberated (but did not freely publicize) to follow what they observe to be a extremely lucrative procurement. Likewise, the associates of the firm's research division are not capable to yield from the news concerning the latest groundbreaking innovation they accomplished momentarily. “The logic for strong-form market efficiency is that the market foresees, in an impartial approach, forthcoming elaborations and consequently the stock value might have integrated the news and estimated in a much more impartial and explanatory method than the insiders” (Yaes, 1989). However, observed study in finance has established verification that is inconstant with the strong form of the Efficient Market Hypothesis.

ASSUPTIONS SURROUNDING EMH

“A group of eminent theorists considers that "noise"-pricing impacts not related with rational prospects about asset values-plays a far superior role than formerly thought in stock market behavior” (Langevoort, 1992). They are emerging substitute models of price performance that undertake prices do make noteworthy partings from asset values. Although their official exertions are still in initial phases, they have made the impression of robust capital market efficiency a justifiably arguable issue. The development of noise theory in the economics writing, is binding it to the wider discussion over the economist's conservative supposition of human wisdom, representing that efficiency is justifiably arguable, and defining the factors of the argument. The efficient market theory commenced as an arithmetic property, trailed later by efforts to clarify through some comprehensible theory why this property holds. “Noise theory proposes a beneficial converse: an understanding of the possible mechanisms of market inefficiency promises to be helpful in discerning about the efficacy of regulatory strategies, especially their inherent limitations in a world of cognitive imperfection” ((Langevoort, 1992)).

Critical appraisal of EMH

In his study paper ‘Anomalies in Relationships Between Securities’ Yields and Yield-Surrogates’; Ball, 1978 (1978) scrutinizes the verification comprised in 20 preceding reports of stock price response to incomes declarations. He discovers that the before the declaration risk adjusted abnormal returns are analytically non-zero in the phase succeeding incomes declarations in a manner uneven with market efficiency. Ball, 1978 claims that the non-zero abnormal yields are owing to insufficiencies in the two-factor asset-pricing model employed in the analyses to alter for risk discrepancies and not to inadequacies in the valuing of shares. He offers procedural propositions for decreasing the approximation partiality owing to insufficiencies in the asset-pricing model.
Watts (1978) in his study ‘Systematic ‘Abnormal’ Returns After Quarterly Earnings Announcements’ discovers statistically substantial atypical yields even after taking all the stages recommended by Ball (1978). The author then goes on to deliver the principal unequivocal test to regulate whether those anomalous yields originate from market inefficiency or from insufficiencies in the asset pricing model. He accomplishes that the abnormal returns are owing to market inadequacies and not asset pricing model insufficiencies.
Thompson (1978) in his study of ‘The Information Content of Discounts and Premiums on Closed-End Fund Shares’ uncovers that a comparatively modest trading instruction made statistically substantial abnormal incomes of about 4% per annum. Thompson is incapable to differentiate on the base of the substantiation whether the abnormal yields are owing to market inadequacies or shortcomings of the two-parameter asset-pricing model.
Galai (1978) in his study ‘Empirical Tests of Boundary Conditions for CBOE Options’ “analyses whether the prices of stocks on the NYSE and the prices of their particular call options on the Chicago Board Options Exchange perform as a sole coordinated market, and if the incomes could have been made through a trading rule on call options on the CBOE and their particular stocks on the NYSE” (Galai, 1978). He discovers that the two markets do not perform as a sole harmonized market.
“One of another empirical studies concludes empirically the association between investment functioning of equity securities and their P/E ratios. Whereas the efficient market hypothesis refutes the prospect of grossing excess returns, the price-ratio hypothesis asserts that P/E ratios, due to amplified investor expectations, may be gauges of future investment performance” (Basu 1977).

An overview of some of the critical research on market efficiency

Stock market efficiency in the Baltic States has been inadequately contemplated or disguised by academics. The primary analyses on the subject showed fifteen years ago, but the entire amount of analyses is quiet truncated. “Investigators have verified weak and semi-strong forms of market efficiency in the area. The nature of statistics, investigation approaches and the phase of time examined varies significantly. One can differentiate ten comprehensive mechanism on market efficiency in the Baltic States” (Degutis, 2014) (as shown in the following Table ).
Butkutė and Moščinskas (1998) as well as Korhonen (1998) conceded out the primary examinations on market efficiency in the Baltic nations. Butkutė and Moščinskas (1998) “ran unit root tests to analyze the unpredictability of stock yields where the null hypothesis of unpredictability could not be excluded for 16 out of the 25 stocks investigated”. Korhonen (1998) “recognized that the Baltic stock markets are incompetent but meaningfully predisposed by the U.S. stock market. On the other hand, they discovered that the Lithuanian and Estonian stock markets were potential market efficiency since stock returns became trickier to forecast. Approximations of the cost of equity for industries are imprecise. Standard errors of more than 3.0% per year are feature for both the CAPM and the three-factor model of Fama and French (1993). “These big standard errors are the consequence of (i) ambiguity about true factor risk premiums and (ii) vague approximations of the loadings of industries on the risk factors. Assessments of the cost of equity for firms and projects are absolutely even less precise” (Fama and French 1992).

Technical trading

“Technical analysis is the analyses of price movement with the supposition that all appropriate news is recognized by the market participants and scorched into a stocks valuing at any given point” (Langseth, 2007). Established on this supposition, and the idea that the central news and market views mirrored by the stock price at any specified time, will lead to recurrent price arrays that, by fitting them to previous fluctuations, can predict the forthcoming course. Technical patterns are supposed to be suitable forecasters for trading entrance and leaving points.

Fundamentalism

Fundamental analysis comprises of exploiting economic statistics to predict prices or measure whether the markets are over or underestimated. “This statistic can for example be stock prices competed to real earning of each stock, calculating real value of a firm's assets paralleled to their book value, crop reports or the last expansion of consumption expenditure in a specified country” (Langseth, 2007).

Beating the market and real world view

In the real world of investment, however, there are evident disagreements against the Efficiency Market Hypothesis. “There is stakeholders who have beaten the market – Warren Buffett, whose investment strategy emphases on undervalued stocks, made billions and set an example for abundant supporters” (Reem, 2013). There are portfolio administrators who have better track records than others, and there are investment houses with more distinguished research examination than others. So how can functioning be unsystematic when people are obviously earning from and thrashing the market?
“Counter arguments to the EMH state that consistent patterns are present. For instance, the January result is a design that displays developed revenues incline to be produced in the first month of the year; and the weekend effect is the propensity for stock returns on Monday to be subordinate than those of the instantaneously earlier Friday” (Reem, 2013). Analyses in behavioral finance, which look into the conclusions of investor attitude on stock prices, also disclose that shareholders are topic to numerous prejudices such as validation, loss-aversion and nerve prejudices. It has been normal to scrutinize an economic time-series by extricating from it a long- term faction, or tendency, for discrete study and then examining the remaining measure for short- term oscillatory actions and random variations. “The supposition latent in this procedure is that the long-term and short-term movements are due to distinct causal influences and consequently that the mathematical process of examination corresponds more or less coarsely to a real dissimilarity of type in the reproductive system” (Kendell 1953).

Results and findings from your own analysis

The following diagrams are the results from our primary empirical research. We constructed two portfolios, made up of at least 12 companies each. The criterion used to build a portfolio was that the smallest companies (lowest market capitalization) at the beginning of the period in analysis. Following graphs shows the comparison of the daily performance trend of the FTSE100 index versus the daily performance trend of each of our portfolios.
Figure.1
Figure.2

Conclusion

Relatively notable is the statement that, to my awareness, not one solo analysis on market efficiency with reverence to accounting knowledge has gratifyingly protected alongside all the possible intimidations to rationality that the author have classified through this paper. Nonetheless, some irregularities have been exposed on the base of investigation projects that are so disposed to to evident pressures that it is tremendously uncertain whether they essentially posture empirical tests to the model of market efficiency.

Works Cited

Arrow, K. 1964, "The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing," Review of Economic Studies http://people.hss.caltech.edu/~pbs/expfinance/Readings/Arrow1964.pdf
Ball, 1978, Ray, 1978, Anomalies in relationships between securities’ yields and yield-surrogates, Journal of Financial Economics 6, this issue. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfinec/v_3a6_3ay_3a1978_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a103-126.htm
Banz, R. W. (1981). The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. Journal of financial economics, 9(1), 3-18. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X81900180
Beaver, William H,1981. "Market efficiency." Accounting Review http://www.jstor.org/stable/246460?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Briloff, A. 1972, Unaccountable Accounting http://www.jstor.org/stable/1121600?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Butkutė, V., Moščinskas, P. 1998. Baltijos šalių vertybinių popierių rinkų aprašomoji analizė. Pinigų studijos, Vol. 2, No. 4, http://www.lb.lt/butkute
Degutis, Augustas, 2014. THE EFFICIENT MARKET HYPOTHESIS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND METHODOLOGY (n.d.): n. pag. EKONOMIKA. Vilnius University, Lithuania. http://www.vu.lt/leidyba/dokumentai/zurnalai/EKONOMIKA/Ekonomika%202014%20932/7-23.pdf
Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work*." The journal of Finance 25.2 http://efinance.org.cn/cn/fm/Efficient%20Capital%20Markets%20A%20Review%20of%20Theory%20and%20Empirical%20Work.pdf
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1997). Industry costs of equity. Journal of financial economics, 43(2), 153-193. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304405X96008963
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. 2006. The value premium and the CAPM. The Journal of Finance, 61(5), 2163-2185. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01054.x/asset/j.1540-6261.2006.01054.x.pdf?v=1&t=i4w63vh1&s=5a97924cb4b2063d952661b1eeaa724d724c1b32
Galai, Dan, 1978, Empirical tests of boundary conditions for CBOE options, Journal of
Financial Economics http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X78900296
Graham, B., D. Dodd, and S. Cottle,1962. Security Analysis , McGraw-Hill. http://paulasset.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Benjamin-Graham_-David-Dodd-Security-Analysis-Sixth-Edition_-Foreword-by-Warren-Buffett.pdf
Langseth, Idi Helge, 2007. Automatic Stock Market Trading Based on Technical Analysis (n.d.): n. pag. Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:347439/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Langevoort, D. C. 1992. Theories, assumptions, and securities regulation: Market efficiency revisited. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 851-920. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3312329?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Lintner , John, 1965. "Security Prices, Risk, and Maximal Gains from Diversification," Journal of Finance,
http://efinance.org.cn/cn/fm/Security%20Prices,%20Risk,%20and%20Maximal%20Gains%20From%20Diversification.pdf
Malkiel, Burton G, 2003. "The efficient market hypothesis and its critics." Journal of economic perspectives 
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3216840?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Muth, J. 1961, "Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements," Econometrica. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1909635?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Kendall, M. G. (1953). The analysis of economic time-series-part i: Prices. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 116(1), 11-34.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2980947?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Korhonen, I. 1998. Preliminary tests on price formation and weak-form efficiency in Baltic stock exchanges. Review of Economies in Transition, Vol. 7, issue. 5, https://helda.helsinki.fi/bof/handle/123456789/12859
S. Basu,1977. Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. The Journal of Finance Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 663-682 http://www.jstor.org/stable/2326304
Thompson, Rex, 1978, The information content of discounts and premiums on closed-end fund shares, Journal of Financial Economics 6, this issue. http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejfinec/v_3a6_3ay_3a1978_3ai_3a2-3_3ap_3a151-186.htm
Watts, ROSS L., 1978, Systematic ‘abnormal’ returns after quarterly earnmgs announcements, Journal of Financial Economics 6, this issue. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X78900272
Reem Heakal, 2013 What Is Market Efficiency?
Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/investopedia/2013/11/01/what-is-market-efficiency/, 2015
Yaes, Robert J, 1989. "The Efficient Market Hypothesis." Science 244.4911 (1989): 1424. Web.