Media Ethics Essay Samples

Abstract

Media ethics entails the subdivision of applied ethics dealing with specific principles of ethics and standards of media. This research focuses on the article entitled, “Neon Tommy editor slams Blendle and micropayments on medium; Blendle hits back that addresses the infighting between the two identified parties, Federman, who school at Annenberg School, and the person who edit the school’s website. It poses a media ethics issue in that the exchanges steer up contention in competition which when reported to the existing and prospective audience for the organization led by the two brings about confusion to the reader. Nevertheless, it provides a good read which also enlightens the conscious reader on the things that take place within their environment. The article is properly presented and reported with view to enhancing easy comprehension. Media ethics so requires reporting based on utmost reliability and credibility if only to avoid malpractices in media information. . Therefore, it is clear that media ethics has played a great deal of a role in influencing the reporting which is presented in the article.

Media ethics

Media ethics entails the subdivision of applied ethics dealing with specific principles of ethics and standards of media. Considering the article, Neon Tommy editor slams Blendle and micropayments on medium; Blendle hits back, it is apparent that the mode of communication that exist among entities and individuals differs substantially based on the context, nature and form of the issue that is being addressed (Thompson, 2015. The article addresses the infighting between the two identified parties. Federman, who school at Annenberg School and the person who edit the school’s website think that ‘iTunes for news’ is indeed an antiquated notion, which is moving towards failure . Alexander clopping, Blendle’s co-founder, takes umbrage on the claims by Federman by arguing that, the focus of making the micropayments work is indeed maximizing the convenience of the readers. This clearly poses a media ethics issue in that the exchanges steer up contention in competition which when reported to the existing and prospective audience for the organization led by the two brings about confusion to the reader.
The reader is left to his or her devices since they are not offered the best option and solution . Essentially, this beats the logic of acceptable ethical processes in media since reporters have to go out of the way to bring to the audience the otherwise confidential details which should be kept by the warring parties. Nevertheless, it provides a good read which also enlightens the conscious reader on the things that take place within their environment. The article reports the indulgence by the two parties from the perspective of the point of view of the two in which case this depicts acceptable ethical practice in media. Media ethics so requires reporting based on utmost reliability and credibility if only to avoid malpractices in media information .
Essentially, the cores in media ethics have been keenly observed, however, much seems to fall on Blendle in which case it is important to balance the arguments appropriately so that elements of biasness do not appear in this case . Nevertheless, the article is properly presented and reported with view to enhancing easy comprehension. Fine details have been given of course with direct quotes from the representatives of both parties. This enhances credibility and reliability of the content of the article . Notably, there is no prominent breach of standards and principles of media ethics. While Klopping notes that Blendle was performing well in business within ten months, Federman strictly points out that his friends had not paid for movies, music and other media based similar products, whereby they are indeed paying to learn journalism now based on the offer made by Blendle. This points out that media ethics standards have been adhered to on a high note since the media reporters balances information from both parties except for the fact that Blendle appears to dominate the scene for their action which the rivals seem to condemn, according to them, and not the reporter.
In light of this, it is apparent that media ethics principles and standards have been recognized to a high degree, something which is indeed acceptable. Therefore, it is clear that media ethics has played a great deal of a role in influencing the reporting which is presented in the article. As such it is clear that the major concept of adherence to rules, regulations, standards and principles is well noted.

References

Christians, C. G. (2008). Media Ethics in Education. Journalism and Communication Monographs, 9(4), 6-8.
Cowling, M. (1996). Controversies in Media Ethics. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(3) , 4-7.
Elliott, D. (2003). Balance and Context: Maintaining Media Ethics. Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 83(2), 10-11.
Rubel, G. F. (2010). Social Media for Attorney: Ethics Considerations and Resources. Strategies: The Journal of Legal Marketing, 12(8), 3-7.
Thompson, C. (2015). ‘Neon Tommy editor slams Blendle and micropayments on medium; Blendle hits back. Retrieved from, http://www.poynter.org/news/mediawire/334283/neon-tommy-editor-slams-blendle-and-micropayments-at-medium-blendle-hits-back/. (Accessed 10 April 2014).