Report On Organizational Effectiveness

Organizational efficiency can be defined as the efficiency with what any organization gains the ability to fulfill its objectives. It is measured by comparing the net profit of the organization to its targeted profit margins. Some added parameters are accurate information on the growth and the results obtained by criminal justice personnel after successfully conducting a survey. It is to a greater extent more significant in ensuring that the organization’s operations are taking place in a proper manner. An organization's ability and will in achieving wider efficiency, better performance, and higher productivity is very critical. Application of efficiency theories in the management of criminal justice personnel will help establish a better understanding of the relationship between individuals in this department for successful operations and better results. The models of giving priority, getting accurate and honest feedback and maintaining full attention on a specific job is very helpful when controlling an organization.
Organizational effectiveness, according to Mihalicz (2012), can be said to be a concept aimed at determining how effective an organization is in completing tasks and in the process achieving the best results. Some short term areas are equally as important as sustainability, corporate culture and the general concern for others in the organization. Leaders and managers are supposed to be at the forefront in demonstrating the strategy and communicate the best ways to achieve more success. Organizational effectiveness gives different meanings to individual organizations that are engaged in building and improving the leadership of the justice department. Additionally, it is accepted globally when effectiveness is described basing on the 21st century survival and competitiveness criteria (Mihalicz, 2012).
In a bid to deal with the changing world that continues to change quickly with technology and digital communications, bodies charged with enforcing the law are required to have robust control mechanisms. The command chain must be strict with the operation in which the organization is engaged. The crude method of the organizational pyramid, with the chief at the peak and other junior officers down below, has to be tilted. The community’s position should be at the pyramid’s top, followed closely by the police, the supervisors, and finally the chief to build the required functions that the organization is expecting (Mihalicz, 2012). By not preparing well in advance, agencies will face many difficulties in dealing with this newly found competition.
Most people in many circumstances are unable to formulate their preferences and general expectations. This result is because preferences and expectations are prone to change over time and different constituency groups hold differing or even contradicting preferences and expectations. A set of methods or criteria may also be unavailable for many organizations. There is need to embrace what is considered rational within most organizations and to concentrate more on the scientific aspects of effective management strategies. Some formulated methods for maintaining management effectiveness are a mixture of certain strategies for keeping the focus on specific tasks, getting relevant data from junior staff, placing feedback as a priority and performing the final assessments. An organization has to use multiple methods when trying to provide effectiveness in its justice unit (Mihalicz, 2012).
The methods for exercising complete control in an organizational setting can be approached with Weber’s bureaucratic approach that provides the structure, rationality, predictability, specialization and democracy (Mihalicz, 2012). Taylor described a more scientific approach to science, selecting workers that provide management skills rather than conflicts in the establishment and training the workers. An integration of those two theories with the administrative theory of training, planning, coordinating, organizing and commanding functions can be used. The organization may be able to be productive with the system set forth to achieve performance and goals. The system approach balances out the appropriate and effective functions of the organization linking all the components to achieve the desired goals. The decision-making process also contributes to setting the organizational goals. There have to be guidelines for establishing performance criteria, defining any issues and classifying them for the development of the criteria resulting to a successful solution. Generating alternatives, comparing alternatives to the criteria, deciding on the correct alternative will assist in the implementation of the correct decision, monitor the decision, and provide feedback.
According to Mihalicz (2012), the structure of the criminal justice department should be arranged in a tree-like configuration, with each branch having a particular duty and power. The allocations should be differentiated on a basis of functionality, and then divided in accordance with specialization. The organization needs to operate according to a system of procedures consisting of formal rules and regulations so that the predictability is not questionable. Hiring and selection of personnel should be impartial in order to have rationality. The responsibility and authority should be recognized by designations and not by persons. This method of exerting control in an organizational setting will help gain balance and provide the organization accomplished tasks to achieve the desired goals. With better control of the organization, the management can assess and guide the members of staff on critical areas of concern. As there is a control strategy in place, exerting the required control on the staff could result in better performance and more intimate interactions between the staff members.
Applying equity and general fairness will prevail in the organization. Stability and tenure of personnel job improve performance within any organization which will encourage and stimulate an employee if initiatives are provided. The interest of the organization should not become subservient to individual interest because this can result in chaos and the organization not being able to thrive and function as needed. Communication is vital for any organization to exert control and effective coordination. Maintaining balance in different sections of the system will assist in keeping the relationship structure inside the organization. Communication within the organization goes a long way when maintaining balance within the organization. Decisions that are considered are a large part of the linking process that the organization approaches and works together to be productive. Decision-making skills are important for all parties in the group to demonstrate. These skills can be shared as people have different views on certain matters that affect the whole organization. The attitude of the individual reflects the success of the organization and the demands that are needed to operate and function in the laid out system for better effectiveness (Mihalicz, 2012).

References

Mihalicz, D. (2012). Effective Managers. Retrieved from http://effectivemanagers.com/dwight-mihalicz/the-importance-of-organizational-effectiveness/