Russian-Ukrainian Conflict Argumentative Essay Examples

Russian-Ukrainian conflict is the greatest security challenge for Ukraine since the Cold War. Ukraine and Russia are on the verge of open full-scale military conflict that may become a trigger for World War III. This conflict entails political, social and linguistic preconditions, in other words historical background demonstrates a significant number of causes. The essential factor in this whirlwind of events is the annexation of Crimea, since the confrontation has transferred the conflict to a full-scale military phase.
Russia's aggression against Ukraine led to international isolation of the federation. In order to divert attention from their actions, Russia has put forward a number of charges against NATO, based on misrepresentation. Russia also made baseless attacks against the legitimacy of the authorities of Ukraine and used force in order to capture part of the Ukrainian territory.
In the political and information fields armed attack on Russia Ukraine called by different terms. On the one hand, this is such definitions as "hybrid warfare", "undeclared war", "phony war", "hidden war", "secret war", "war bubble", "irregular warfare," "nonlinear War", "napivviyna "," war controlled chaos "and so on. Perhaps specified
Approach is an attempt to reflect the specific verbal war waged by Russia, which, by means of his conduct is different from the traditional classic wars. Perhaps, the only way to avoid the use of accurate and legally calibrated term "war of aggression". The use of euphemisms is consistent with the infamous do not irritate Russian policy, that policy "not to irritate Russia", which many shybnulysya both Western and Ukrainian politicians and intellectuals. However, on the other hand, there are also attempts to describe the situation caused by armed attack Russia in Ukraine as "political crisis", "civil war", "Ukrainian-Ukrainian war." In fact, such attempts to deny the power annexation of the Crimea and Russia look at the war on the Eastern Ukraine as an international as well as the internal conflict, responsibility for which lies with the Ukrainian government. A striking example of that is the position paper of 30 June 2014 and the first report of 24 July 2014 First based in New York City Human Rihts Watch. The proposed human rights organization that legal analysis of the situation caused by armed attack Russia in Ukraine, based on selective use of facts, manipulation has character, is biased and essentially imitating official line of the Russian power establishment who is trying to mislead the international community to justify their illegal behavior and generally deny Russia's participation in the aggression.
Conflict resolution is a joint activity of the participants to end combat and to address the problems that led to the collision. Conflict resolution involves the activity of both parties in order to transform the conditions in which they interact and to eliminate the causes of the conflict. In order to resolve the conflict it is of paramount importance to address its root cause. The Russian-Ukrainian conflict already ripe conditions for its solution. Firstly, the conflict is sufficiently mature and the warring parties are aware of the contradictions that objectively exist between them, as well as differences and opposition, which require an intervention for their removal. Secondly, there is a need to overcome together the controversies that have arisen. Thirdly, it is possible, including through a third person, separate or joint search and use the available rules and methods for resolving the conflict that took place between the countries. The way to solve the Russian-Ukrainian conflict can be a set of measures called, for instance "long-term lease of the Crimean peninsula." The conflict participants and intermediaries should consider steps for resolution. It is extremely difficult, since Putin claims that Russians and Ukrainians are Slavic nations, their reunion in one state would mean one church, one language and one culture, in other words the Russian world.
at stake "not only preserve the sovereignty of Ukraine, but the effectiveness of the European order based on the principles of respect for territorial integrity and non-use of force in international relations."
For if they continue to indulge in, allow it to consolidate the right of appropriation of land illegally seized neighborhood sovereign state - as a result we will have complete collapse of international relations in the world, termination guarantees the inviolability of borders and non basic principles of sovereignty and law. On the other hand, no doubt, of course, that the head of can not go for a simple return of the Crimea, as it would be political suicide for him.
The use of artificial separatism as a political tool, initiated from within, but funded and supported by Russia, also aims only destabilize the social and political life of the region.
 
Relations between Russia and Ukraine, though not always by name were strategic never consisted easily. The reasons for this were many as in the history of modern political and social development of both countries, and in the more familiar things - the economy and the financial sector. Russia, from the standpoint of "big brother" always tried pryhlyanuty for "younger sister" Ukraine, send it the right way. Despite a slow and long last Europeanization, Russia was sure that it has enough tools to prevent Ukraine from end to get out of its geo-strategic field of influence. Dynamics of good neighborly relations gradually decreased, in direct proportion to the decrease in mutual dependence of countries on the collapse of the Soviet Union to the present. However major crisis for a long time Ukraine and Russia avoided. With a stretch to include significant exacerbations of conflict unless on. Tuzla in the Kerch Strait in 2003, and the so-called "gas war" permanently ongoing since 2005. But in 2014 everything changed. The origins of today's war between Russia and Ukraine multifaceted and heterogeneous. Consider and describe the most important of them.
Russia is against Ukraine large-scale and long-term war, which only in spring 2014 moved into an open confrontation in the East of Ukraine. Wars have different classification - on strategies and objectives, according to the methods of reference to instruments, etc.
Strategy of Russia's war against Ukraine has three components - the destruction of the Ukrainian nation as ethnos, the destruction of specific Ukrainian identity and the physical destruction of the Ukrainians, Russian, Chechen and other nations that hamper the establishment of imperial Russia.
Russian political elite tend to believe that Ukraine without Russia is geopolitically incomplete and cannot become developed and economically advanced country. It seems completely obvious that the trigger that led to the current situation, was the annexation of the Crimea. Moscow keeps justifing its seizure of Crimea, on the pretext that it was the protection of Russian speaking minorities. The fact that more than the half of the residents are Crimean Tatars who do not want to live in Russia. The most terrifying aspect of the conflict is the misleading Russian TV. Not only television bends the truth, the lie is blatant. Therefore, the notion “digital war” has popped up.
Russian government claims about the illegality of the Ukrainian authorities. President of Ukraine Poroshenko was elected to this post on May 25, gaining a clear majority of votes in the elections, which were characterized by the OSCE, as evidence of "a clear intention of the authorities to hold real elections, which were generally in line with international obligations, in compliance with fundamental freedoms of citizens". Severe restrictions were recorded only in areas controlled by separatists to undertake enhanced attempts to disrupt the process. The current government of Ukraine was approved by an overwhelming majority of the Ukrainian Parliament (371 votes out of 417 registered) in 2014, including members of the Party of Regions. This parliament was elected in 2012. Russia's Foreign Ministry said at the time elections were held "in a calm atmosphere without any incidents and are consistent with generally accepted standards.
Russian officials continue to assert that the Ukrainian parliament and government is dominated by Nazis and fascists. However, in the presidential election on May 25 candidates, of which Russia have been assessed as "fascists", only garnered a 1% of the votes. Ukrainian voters clearly voted for unity and moderation, not the separatism and extremism.
Russia claims that the so-called referendum in the Crimea was a legitimate Russian official procedure. The referendum was illegal under the Constitution of Ukraine (in Ukrainian read here in Russian here in English here), which states that the questions "about changing the territory of Ukraine are resolved exclusively Ukrainian referendum." Crimea as part of Ukraine has the status of an autonomous republic, but all questions regarding its power had to be resolved by the Parliament of Ukraine, and its constitution had to be approved by the Parliament of Ukraine. In addition, the so-called referendum was held a few weeks the self-proclaimed leadership of the Crimea, interned by the Russian military in arms after the seizure of government buildings. It is obvious that such bogus referendum organized by the self-proclaimed authorities do not have any democratic legitimacy. It should be noted that Moscow has never addressed in any international body with a complaint of allegedly taking place discrimination against Russian-speaking citizens of Ukraine.
Kremlin leaders forced Viktor Yanukovych, who was elected in 2010, to abandon the course of European and Euro-Atlantic integration and implement anti-Ukrainian policy. The main agenda is not it considered a temporary return to the bosom of Ukraine and its return permanently. Achieving this goal had to guarantee the stay of Ukraine in the Russian sphere of influence as well as the smooth and systematic destruction of Ukrainian identity both at the individual and national level. In practice, this meant the transformation of "Ukrainian Ukraine" to "Ukraine without a Ukrainian". Russified Ukraine was believed to be an integral part of "Russian world" without any chance to preserve independent statehood. However, the collapse of the Yanukovych regime opened the prospect for termination of devastating destruction of Ukraine's national identity and restored the course of European and Euro-Atlantic integration. Feeling a loss of control over Ukraine, Putin resorted to armed aggression that not only was revenge for the Ukrainian Independence, but was planned as a means of rapid military annexation of the country once and for all.

Works Cited

Bebler, Anton. “Freezing a Conflict: The Russian-Ukrainian Struggle over Crimea.” Israel Journal of foreign Affairs 8.3 (2014): 63-73. Web.
Chikhi, Sabrina. “Ukraine Conflict: Resolution through Negotiation.” Peace & Conflict Monitor. Web. August 22 2014.
Pifer, Steven. “Crisis Between Ukraine and Russia.” Contingency Planning Memorandum 3 (2009, July): 1-9. Web.
Pynnöniemi, Katri. “Russian Thinking in the Ukraine Crisis. From Drawing a Line of Defence to Seeing a Threat to National Security.” Fiia Briefing Paper 160 (2014, September): 3-9. Web.
Trenin, Dmitri. “The Ukraine Crisis and the Resumption of Great-Power Rivalry.” Carnegie Moscow Center (2014, July): 1-27. Web.
Wilson, Andrew. “The Donbas between Ukraine and Russia: The Use of History in Political Disputes.” Journal of Contemporary History 30 (1995, April): 265-289. Print.