Sample Argumentative Essay On Seat Belts Should Be A Requirement In Every State

Safety belts are considered to be the furthermost functioning means of lowering deaths and severe injuries when it comes to traffic crashes. The huge majority of injuries as well as deaths that result traffic crashes are avoidable. Nearly 90 individuals die each day due to motor automobile crashes. If lap and shoulder belts are effectively used, they decrease the jeopardy of lethal injury to passengers who are positioned at the front by 45 percent in addition to the danger of temperate to serious injury by a percentage of about 50. Roughly 60 percent of commuters exterminated in traffic smashes were not donned in safety belts, rendering to the (NHTSA) National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. It is essential for all states to enact the policy that govern the use of safety belts since they offer the greatest safety against ejection when passengers encounter a crash. NHTSA indicates that seventy-five percent of individuals ejected from automobiles are killed.
States that normally have secondary implementation average merely 63 percent use of belts. However, states that normally have standard implementation belt rules average 78 percent when it comes to the use of seat belts. Essentially, every person would approve that shielding lives with the use of seat belts is usually as significant as a wrecked tail light or maybe littering. Nevertheless, while practically every single state has customary laws that permit officers involved with law enforcement to stop in addition to ticketing a violator because of breaking a tail light or even throwing trash through a car’s window, various states presently fail to have standard laws that ensure seat belts are used. Aggregating the countrywide seat belt usage from the current 68 percent to 90 percent would avert a projected 5,536 mortalities, 132,670 injuries in addition to saving the state about $8.8 billion per annum (Sharpe 2011).
Conferring to the NHTSA report, approximately 15,000 lives or more are protected every single year in the United States for the reason that drivers as well as their passengers had fastened their seat belts when they engaged in an accident. Lacking seat belts in a car or failure to fasten them when a car is in motion, the driver as well as passengers may probably bounce from place to place in the car, hammering surfaces for instance the doors and windows, windshield, the dashboard as well as each other. Unrestrained persons may also be ejected out of the vehicle as a result of the force created by the impact. Being ejected from the vehicle is a key cause of grave injuries in addition to deaths during accidents. The seat belt averts this from occurring by limiting an individual’s movement besides holding them in place. One may end up with contusions caused by the seat belt, however, these are negligible matched with the wounds that would then occur (Tatar 2008).
Considering the fact that the back seat is essentially the innocuous place to drive in a car, back-seat passengers who are unbelted risk grave injury besides posing a possibly fatal hazard to others in a crash. Grownups who fail to buckle up basically send a deadly implication to kids that it is okay not wear the safety belts. Investigations carried out over the states in U.S indicate that when a driver fails to buckle, about 76 percent of children will also fail to buckle. However, when a driver decides to buckle, 87 percent of kids will also tend to buckle. It is also worth noting that passengers who sit in the rear seat require to buckle. According to an analysis carried out by NHTSA in the year 2004, it was unraveled that 47 percent of passengers who occupy the rear seat were fastened their belts as compared to 80 percent of passengers who were seated in the anterior seat (Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW 2010).
Day in day out, emergency physicians usually witness the tragic consequences associated with people who fail to wear safety belts. At the instance of impact during a traffic crash, passengers in the car are essentially still traveling at the initial speed. At the time the motor vehicle promptly comes to a halt, anybody who has not fastened their safety belt will carry on moving at that speed up to the time their body bangs into the windshield, steering wheel or other sections of the interior or may be ejected from the car (AIMS Multimedia (Firm) 2014).
Safety belts are essential when it comes to dropping death cases and damages initiated during impact. “Considering a 55 mph crash, passengers who have not fastened their belts and are of regular size fly headlong with a 3,000 pounds force which is normally enough to bring about severe injury or even death” (United States 2009). Travelers who are seated at the rear are also as susceptible as those in the front seats. Safety parameters must be used properly to offer maximum guard during a crash. By merely wearing the shoulder strap it is possible for an individual slide out before being strangled. The lap belt only also does not keep the passenger’s face from hammering the steering dashboard, wheel and windshield. It is important to note that both straps should fit snugly to transmit the effect of the smash two parts of the body which can take it.
Every individual is involved in paying for passengers who fail to fasten their seat belts. Health care services as well as insurance charges that are incurred as a result of drivers who fail to fasten their seat belts and passengers who are involved in crashes are normally passed to every person. For instance the charges of hospital care when it comes to unbelted driver usually range at 50 percent higher than the cost incurred for a driver whose seat belt was fastened. The society usually bears about 85 percent of the total cost as compared to those individuals who are involved. Some individuals see the option to fasten seat belts as a subject of individual freedom. On the other hand, in the society, individual freedoms stop when other people are engaged in dangerous or even fatal things. This is particularly true rendering to the safety of children who are passengers in an engine vehicle. A kid who is unrepressed in a 30-mile-per-hour smash can be likened to a child thrown down all the way from window third story (United States 2009).
When the public is enquired if they care about primary enforcement rules that basically give law implementation the power to stop as well as ticket occupants who are unbuckled just as done to other monotonous violations of the regulation for instance littering or driving a car that has a wrecked tail light, they overwhelming back the laws. As soon as the public discovers that in most cases when the driver fails to fasten his seat belt, passengers who comprise children also fails to fasten their seat belts, about 70 percent back the seat belt enforcement laws. Therefore, it should be totally unacceptable for any person to ride while unbuckled in all the states in America.
Car accidents are considered to be the utmost cause when it comes deaths for persons who are either about five years of age as well as those who are 34 years old. Separately from the death toll, many individuals suffer severe injuries due to the incidents. Rendering to the report by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it is worth noting that seat belts lessen the danger of death in car accidents by about 50%. Safe caution driving guidelines, like to hearten drivers so that they can endorse the habit of putting their seat belt on, normally have the capacity to safeguard drivers as well as passengers (Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW 2010).
In conclusion, seat belt rules are a significant part of inspiring drivers as well as passengers to fasten up before they get on with the travelling. A lot of research conducted to display the efficiency of seat belt rules as well as their consequences have proven that seat belts basically aid in helping alleviate road carnage. Preusser Research Group conducted an extensive study in the year 2011 to relate the two kinds of laws governing the use of seat belts in the United States. “Several states have already instigated primary seat belt regulations, implying that a law enactment officer is permitted to pull over those drivers who specifically fail to fasten their seat belt” (Muffins 2012).
Rendering to other states, they just have secondary rules that consent for a ticket to be allotted if the passenger or driver fails to fasten their seat belt, nevertheless only on one occasion the car has been hauled over for a different reason. The study proposes that there exists a 15% dissimilarity in the use of seat belts when comparing states that normally have either the primary or secondary laws. After calculations of all the numbers, it is concluded that, states that essentially have primary laws have a tendency to safeguard more drivers in addition to preventing more injuries as well as fatalities as a result of automobile collisions. In essence, most of the lives are saved by the primary laws.

References

AIMS Multimedia (Firm). (2014). Driving safely. Chatsworth, CA: AIMS Multimedia.
Barr Films. (2012). Seatbelts save lives. Insurance Bureau of Canada = Bureau d'assurance du Canada.
Muffins, M., (2012). Seatbelts and passenger restraints. Irwindale, CA: Barr Films.
Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW. (2010). Seatbelts without tears. N.S.W.: Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW.
Sharpe, V. A. (2011). Accountability: Patient Safety and Policy Reform. Washington, D.C: Georgetown University Press
Tator. (2008). Catastrophic Injuries in Sports and Recreation: Causes and Prevention – A Canadian Study. Toronto; Buffalo; London: University of Toronto Press.
United States. (2009). The performance and use of child restraint systems, seatbelts, and air bags for children in passenger vehicles: Safety study. Washington, D.C: National Transportation Safety Board.