Sample Research Paper On The Specific Aims Of The Study Are:

Does the use of sequential compressions devices and anticoagulants together decrease the incidence of deep in vein thrombosis than the use of single modalities in critically ill patients?
The main aim of the study here is to research and determine how the use of the sequential compression devices and the anticoagulants can effectively reduce the incidence of the deep vein thrombosis among the patients. The study will further compare the research results to the use of the single modalities in the critically ill patients.

I. How the use of sequential compressions devices and anticoagulants together offer different outcomes compared to single modalities ?
II. What is the effectiveness of the use of single modalities in critically ill patients ?
III. How the use of sequential compressions devices and anticoagulants together as intervention offer different outcomes in critically ill patients?
IV. what do you do in comparing the results on the use of sequential compression devices and anticoagulants together to those generated by the use of single modalities in critically ill patients?
The proffered analysis avails some of the specific questions that the study seeks to explore. The stipulated questions provide a diverse aspect in relation to addressing the problem of the study hence offering feasible intervention approaches.
The study will take a population study of 500 people that will be divided into groups of five and by the use of interview questions. The researcher will be able to get the solutions of the above research questions that are needed in our research. The results therefore will be used to act and find the relevant solutions that might be needed.
There are diverse recommended approaches aimed at addressing the increasing rate of incidence of deep in vein thrombosis. The management of multisystem trauma patients is facilitated by the deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. However, without the use of thromboprophylaxis, the rate of venous thrombosis and the respective pulmonary embolism is marginal. Through the use of different prophylactic modalities such as; pharmacologic anticoagulation, inferior vena cava filtration and the mechanical compression devices the practitioners still find it difficult. These rates have been assumed to be lowered by such approaches (Bailey et al., 1991).

References

Bailey P. et al. (1991). Prospective randomized trial of sequential compression device vs. low dose warfin for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in total hip arthroplasty. PubMed Available at. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1774568
Giancarlo A. (2011). Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical patients. Available at. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/110/24_suppl_1/IV-4.full
Rhys J. and John P. (2004). Evidence Based Compression: Prevention of Statis and Deep Vein Thrombosis. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1356208/
Effective Health Care Program, (2010). Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Mechanical Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism Among Spevial Populatoons. Available at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/341/928/VTE-Special-Populations_Protocol_20120112.pdf
Jerry A. (2010). Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Comparing the Cost, Risk, and Benefits of Competing Strategies for the Primary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism. Available at. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/110/24_suppl_1/IV-25.full