What Were The Founding Fathers Worried About? Critical Thinking Samples
Type of paper: Critical Thinking
Topic: People, Government, Politics, Founding, Democracy, Law, Constitution, Absolutism
Pages: 1
Words: 275
Published: 2020/10/15
The founding fathers in 1787 feared regarding the rights of the people of the nation. The founding fathers were concerned about the democracy as the American Confederation was found to be getting unsuccessful. Therefore, the democracy of the people would get to the risk, and the people rights of freedom would be put into concern. Moreover, the founding fathers were afraid of the tyranny imposed by the government on the people. Such a tyranny would avert the people from enjoying their right to freedom. The founding fathers could see the people striving for their rights due to lack of democracy.
The founding fathers wanted the welfare of the people of the nation and in order to prevent the prevalence of tyranny by the government, the people provide an excessive liberty to get involved in the governmental affairs. The government would do as the majority of the people would demand. Moreover, people can directly rule through the representatives, and these representatives will be elected by the fair voting system held by the people. People were not restricted to the education, social, and property affairs rather they were allowed to hold the office on broader terms. Consequently, people were broadly defined in the governmental matters. The founding fathers were worried at the same time related to the involvement of people in the government. The founding fathers were worried about the fact that if the people participated in the government affairs excessively, then the political systems might experience a great loss.
The central government which is illustrated in the document has the responsibility of looking for the people’s benefit in all aspect of life. Government should be able to safeguard the people rights and protect them from any mishap. In order to improve the tasks of the government, the constitution has to be revised and improvised. Instead, the new constitution was set up conversely; few amendments would have formulated a better constitution.
- APA
- MLA
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Chicago
- ASA
- IEEE
- AMA